Mapping of Indian neuroscience research: A scientometric analysis of research output during 1999-2008

被引:30
作者
Bala, Adarsh [1 ]
Gupta, B. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Govt Med Coll & Hosp, Cent Lib, Chandigarh, India
[2] Natl Inst Sci Technol & Dev Studies, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
India; neuroscience; quantitative analysis; research output; NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH; JOURNALS;
D O I
10.4103/0028-3886.60393
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective : This study analyses the research output in India in neurosciences during the period 1999-2008 and the analyses included research growth, rank, global publications share, citation impact, share of international collaborative papers and major collaborative partner countries and patterns of research communication in most productive journals. It also analyses the characteristics of most productive institutions, authors and high-cited papers. The publication output and impact of India is also compared with China, Brazil and South Korea. Materials and Method s: Scopus Citation database was used for retrieving the publications output of India and other countries in neurosciences during 1999-2008. Results : Indias global publications share in neurosciences during the study period was 0.99 (with 4503 papers) and it ranked 21 (st) among the top 26 countries in neurosciences. The average annual publication growth rate was 11.37, shared 17.34 of international collaborative papers and the average citation per paper was 4.21. India was far behind China, Brazil and South Korea in terms of publication output, citation quality and share of international collaborative papers in neurosciences. Conclusion : India is far behind in terms of publication output, citation quality and share of international collaborative papers in neurosciences when compared to other countries with an emerging economy. There is an urgent need to substantially increase the research activities in the field of neurosciences in India.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 41
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Neurological research in Italy in 2003 and 2004 [J].
Berardelli, A ;
Barberini, I ;
Defazio, G ;
Mancardi, GL ;
Messina, C .
NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 26 (04) :189-193
[2]   Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals [J].
Braun, T ;
Glänzel, W ;
Schubert, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (03) :499-510
[3]   PRODUCTIVITY AND VISIBILITY OF CUBAN NEUROSCIENTISTS: BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY OF THE PERIOD 2001-2005 [J].
Dorta-Contreras, A. J. ;
Arencibia-Jorge, R. ;
Marti-Lahera, Y. ;
Araujo-Ruiz, J. A. .
REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2008, 47 (07) :355-360
[4]   The decline of Swedish neuroscience:: Decomposing a bibliometric national science indicator [J].
Glänzel, W ;
Danell, R ;
Persson, O .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 57 (02) :197-213
[5]   UTILITY OF BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR RESEARCH POLICY - A CASE-STUDY OF SPANISH RESEARCH IN NEUROSCIENCE [J].
GOMEZ, I ;
SANZ, E ;
MENDEZ, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1990, 19 (05) :457-466
[6]  
Lopez-Munoz F, 1996, Rev Neurol, V24, P417
[7]   Neurological research in Europe, as assessed with a four-year overview of neurological science international journals [J].
Mela, GS ;
Mancardi, GL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2002, 249 (04) :390-395
[8]   A snapshot of EU publications in sleep research: A scientometric survey [J].
Robert, Claude ;
Wilson, Concepcion S. ;
Gaudy, Jean-Francois ;
Arreto, Charles-Daniel .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 67 (03) :385-405
[9]   Neuroscience output of China: A MEDLINE-based bibliometric study [J].
Xu, W ;
Chen, YZ ;
Shen, ZC .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 57 (03) :399-409