CLO Equity Return and Manager Selection

被引:0
作者
Bicer, Batur [1 ]
Brauchler, Ryan [1 ]
Secmen, Serhan [1 ]
Wang, Maggie M. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Napier Pk Global Capital, New York, NY 10017 USA
[2] Citigrp, New York, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURED FINANCE | 2019年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.3905/jsf.2019.1.085
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this article, the authors investigate the drivers of CLO equity return and how to identify a good CLO manager. Pre-crisis collateralized loan obligation (CLO) structures proved to be very robust in the end. Today's CLOs are structured more conservatively with generally more CLO debt subordination, cleaner asset pools, and less reinvestment flexibility. Looking at historical CLO equity performance, CLO 1.0 equity benefited from having cheap funding costs and opportunities to buy discounted loans during the financial crisis, ultimately achieving over 20% IRR. CLO 2.0 equity's returns have been running lower so far in a benign credit market. The authors note that top-quartile US CLO equity always delivered lowto-mid- teens' returns, regardless of market timing. It is also worth noting that CLO equity's deal-level and manager-level performance dispersion is evident across different vintages and even more pronounced today than before the Global Financial Crisis as the number of US CLO managers grew from 100 managers pre-crisis to more than 130 today, with the outstanding US CLO market having more than doubled in size.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 58
页数:12
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, CLO SPOTLIGHT DO CLO
  • [2] Secmen S., 2019, CHOOSING CLO EQUITY
  • [3] How to Value CLO Managers: Tell Me Who Your Manager Is, I'll Tell You How Your CLO Will Do
    Secmen, Serhan
    Bicer, Batur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURED FINANCE, 2013, 19 (03): : 49 - 55
  • [4] Wang M., 2017, PRICE CLO MANAGER PE
  • [5] Wang M., 2015, WHICH CLO MANAGER ST
  • [6] Wang M., 2018, CITIGROUP CLO SCOREC
  • [7] Wang M., 2018, PICKING YOUR ALLIES