Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems

被引:313
作者
Foley, Jeffrey [1 ]
de Haas, David [1 ]
Hartley, Ken [2 ]
Lant, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Adv Water Management Ctr, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Ken Hartley Pty Ltd, Unit F1C, Forest Lake 4078, Australia
关键词
Life cycle inventory; Biological nutrient removal; Energy; Nutrient recovery; Global environmental impacts; Effluent standards; Greenhouse gas; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; METAL CONTENTS; FERTILIZERS; SLUDGE; SCALE; OPTIONS; IMPACT; SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over recent decades, the environmental regulations on wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) have trended towards increasingly stringent nutrient removal requirements for the protection of local waterways. However, such regulations typically ignore other environmental impacts that might accompany apparent improvements to the WWTP. This paper quantitatively defines the life cycle inventory of resources consumed and emissions produced in ten different wastewater treatment scenarios (covering six process configurations and nine treatment standards). The inventory results indicate that infrastructure resources, operational energy, direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and chemical consumption generally increase with increasing nitrogen removal, especially at discharge standards of total nitrogen < 5 mgN L-1. Similarly, infrastructure resources and chemical consumption increase sharply with increasing phosphorus removal, but operational energy and direct GHG emissions are largely unaffected. These trends represent a trade-off of negative environmental impacts against improved local receiving water quality. However, increased phosphorus removal in WWTPs also represents an opportunity for increased resource recovery and reuse via biosolids applied to agricultural land. This study highlights that where biosolids displace synthetic fertilisers, a negative environmental trade-off may also occur by increasing the heavy metals discharged to soil. Proper analysis of these positive and negative environmental trade-offs requires further life cycle impact assessment and an inherently subjective weighting of competing environmental costs and benefits. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1654 / 1666
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Greenhouse gas inventory reference manual
[2]  
[Anonymous], CHEM ENG DESIGN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Theory, Design and Operation of Nutrient Removal Activated Sludge Process
[5]  
Barry G, 2006, SUSTAINABLE BIOSOLID
[6]  
*BAT MEM I, 1999, BACKGR REP FERT US C
[7]  
Camelo LGD, 1997, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V204, P245, DOI 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00187-3
[8]   METAL CONTENTS OF FERTILIZERS MARKETED IN IOWA [J].
CHARTER, RA ;
TABATABAI, MA ;
SCHAFER, JW .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1993, 24 (9-10) :961-972
[9]   Differential kinetics of ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria:: A simple kinetic study based on oxygen affinity and proton release during nitrification [J].
Ciudad, G. ;
Werner, A. ;
Bornhardt, C. ;
Munoz, C. ;
Antileo, C. .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 41 (08) :1764-1772
[10]  
DEALMEIDA AT, 2007, APPENDIX 8 EUP LOT 1