Different qualifiers of AUS/FLUS thyroid FNA have distinct BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARg alterations

被引:38
作者
Bellevicine, Claudio [1 ]
Sgariglia, Roberta [1 ]
Migliatico, Ilaria [1 ]
Vigliar, Elena [1 ]
D'Anna, Melania [1 ]
Nacchio, Maria Antonia [1 ]
Serra, Nicola [1 ]
Malapelle, Umberto [1 ]
Bongiovanni, Massimo [2 ]
Troncone, Giancarlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Federico II Univ Naples, Dept Publ Hlth, Via Sergio Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Inst Pathol, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
7-gene test; atypia of undetermined significance; follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS; FLUS); Bethesda system; diagnostic qualifiers; molecular diagnosis; thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA); FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; BETHESDA SYSTEM; UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE; CYTOPATHOLOGY; MALIGNANCY; ATYPIA; MUTATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; CATEGORY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21984
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDThe Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology category of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) includes fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens that cannot straightforwardly be classified as benign or malignant. To determine whether morphological subcategorization based on atypia qualifiers and molecular testing could improve malignancy risk stratification of AUS/FLUS patients, this study assessed the correlation between these qualifiers and the molecular alterations commonly harbored by thyroid neoplasms. METHODSA total of 162 AUS/FLUS cases were subcategorized by atypia qualifiers (Hurthle cell changes, architectural atypia, and cytologic atypia [CyA]) and were tested for BRAF, N-H-KRAS, RET/PTC, and paired box 8 (PAX8)/peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPARg) mutations. RESULTSCyA was observed more frequently in mutation-positive AUS/FLUS (14 of 37 [37.84%]) than mutation-negative AUS/FLUS (20 of 125 [16.00%]; P < .0084), and it specifically harbored the BRAFV600E point mutation. Malignancy was confirmed in the available follow-up. Conversely, although RAS was the most frequent mutation identified in AUS/FLUS FNA specimens (26 of 37 cases [70.27%]; P < .0001), it was distributed across various AUS/FLUS subcategories and was not significantly associated with a specific atypia qualifier or malignant outcome according to the available follow-up. Rearrangements of both RET/PTC (n = 1) and PAX8/PPARg (n = 3) were rarely retrieved in the FNA samples. CONCLUSIONSBRAF and RAS mutations are associated with different AUS/FLUS qualifiers and hence have different risks of malignancy. Consequently, a hybrid molecular and morphological subcategorization system could improve the malignancy risk stratification of thyroid FNA samples diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:317-25. (c) 2018 American Cancer Society. Diagnostic qualifiers can improve the malignancy risk stratification of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cases. Here an association is reported between atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance qualifiers and specific genomic profiles, which in turn have different positive predictive values.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Histopathologic and Clinical Characterization of Thyroid Tumors Carrying the BRAFK601E Mutation [J].
Afkhami, Michelle ;
Karunamurthy, Arivarasan ;
Chiosea, Simion ;
Nikiforova, Marina N. ;
Seethala, Raja ;
Nikiforov, Yuri E. ;
Coyne, Christopher .
THYROID, 2016, 26 (02) :242-247
[2]  
Ali SZ., 2018, BETHESDA SYSTEM REPO
[3]   Intra-institutional second opinion diagnosis can reduce unnecessary surgery for indeterminate thyroid FNA: A preliminary report on 34 cases [J].
Bellevicine, C. ;
Migliatico, I. ;
Vigliar, E. ;
Serra, N. ;
Troncone, G. .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 28 (04) :254-258
[4]   Cytopathologists can reliably perform ultrasound-guided thyroid fine needle aspiration: a 1-year audit on 3715 consecutive cases [J].
Bellevicine, C. ;
Vigliar, E. ;
Malapelle, U. ;
Pisapia, P. ;
Conzo, G. ;
Biondi, B. ;
Vetrani, A. ;
Troncone, G. .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02) :115-121
[5]   The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Bongiovanni, Massimo ;
Spitale, Alessandra ;
Faquin, William C. ;
Mazzucchelli, Luca ;
Baloch, Zubair W. .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (04) :333-339
[6]   The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [J].
Cibas, Edmund S. ;
Ali, Syed Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 132 (05) :658-665
[7]   Impact of Molecular Screening for Point Mutations and Rearrangements in Routine Air-Dried Fine-Needle Aspiration Samples of Thyroid Nodules [J].
Eszlinger, Markus ;
Krogdahl, Annelise ;
Muenz, Sina ;
Rehfeld, Christian ;
Jensen, Eva Magrethe Precht ;
Ferraz, Carolina ;
Boesenberg, Eileen ;
Drieschner, Norbert ;
Scholz, Markus ;
Hegedus, Laszlo ;
Paschke, Ralf .
THYROID, 2014, 24 (02) :305-313
[8]   The prediction of malignant risk in the category "atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance" of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology using subcategorization and BRAF mutation results [J].
Hyeon, Jiyeon ;
Ahn, Soomin ;
Shin, Jung Hee ;
Oh, Young Lyun .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 122 (05) :368-376
[9]   Thyroid Atypia of Undetermined Significance or Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance: An Indispensable Bethesda 2010 Diagnostic Category or Waste Garbage? [J].
Kholova, Ivana ;
Ludvikova, Marie .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2014, 58 (04) :319-329
[10]   Development of a gene panel for nextgeneration sequencing of clinically relevant mutations in cell-free DNA from cancer patients [J].
Malapelle, Umberto ;
Mayo de-Las-Casas, Clara ;
Rocco, Danilo ;
Garzon, Monica ;
Pisapia, Pasquale ;
Jordana-Ariza, Nuria ;
Russo, Maria ;
Sgariglia, Roberta ;
De Luca, Caterina ;
Pepe, Francesco ;
Martinez-Bueno, Alejandro ;
Morales-Espinosa, Daniela ;
Gonzalez-Cao, Maria ;
Karachaliou, Niki ;
Viteri Ramirez, Santiago ;
Bellevicine, Claudio ;
Angel Molina-Vila, Miguel ;
Rosell, Rafael ;
Troncone, Giancarlo .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 116 (06) :802-810