Contributions of individual face features to face discrimination

被引:28
作者
Logan, Andrew J. [1 ]
Gordon, Gael E. [2 ]
Loffler, Gunter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Dept Life Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Face perception; Psychophysics; Unfamiliar faces; Face features; Holistic; INTERNAL FACIAL FEATURES; UNFAMILIAR FACES; EXTERNAL FEATURES; FEATURE SALIENCY; RECOGNITION; FAMILIAR; PERCEPTION; AREA; INVERSION; PROSOPAGNOSIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.011
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Faces are highly complex stimuli that contain a host of information. Such complexity poses the following questions: (a) do observers exhibit preferences for specific information? (b) how does sensitivity to individual face parts compare? These questions were addressed by quantifying sensitivity to different face features. Discrimination thresholds were determined for synthetic faces under the following conditions: (i) 'full face': all face features visible; (ii) 'isolated feature': single feature presented in isolation; (iii) 'embedded feature': all features visible, but only one feature modified. Mean threshold elevations for isolated features, relative to full-faces, were 0.84x, 1.08, 2.12, 3.34, 4.07 and 4.47 for head-shape, hairline, nose, mouth, eyes and eyebrows respectively. Hence, when two full faces can be discriminated at threshold, the difference between the eyes is about four times less than what is required when discriminating between isolated eyes. In all cases, sensitivity was higher when features were presented in isolation than when they were embedded within a face context (threshold elevations of 0.94x, 1.74, 2.67, 2.90, 5.94 and 9.94). This reveals a specific pattern of sensitivity to face information. Observers are between two and four times more sensitive to external than internal features. The pattern for internal features (higher sensitivity for the nose, compared to mouth, eyes and eyebrows) is consistent with lower sensitivity for those parts affected by facial dynamics (e.g. facial expressions). That isolated features are easier to discriminate than embedded features supports a holistic face processing mechanism which impedes extraction of information about individual features from full faces.(C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region [J].
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
McCarthy, G .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (07) :267-278
[2]   Internal and External Features of the Face Are Represented Holistically in Face-Selective Regions of Visual Cortex [J].
Andrews, Timothy J. ;
Davies-Thompson, Jodie ;
Kingstone, Alan ;
Young, Andrew W. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (09) :3544-3552
[3]   External facial features modify the representation of internal facial features in the fusiform face area [J].
Axelrod, Vadim ;
Yovel, Galit .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 52 (02) :720-725
[4]   PROSOPAGNOSIA AND FACIAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
BENTON, AL ;
VANALLEN, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1972, 15 (02) :167-&
[5]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[6]   Verification of face identities from images captured on video [J].
Bruce, V ;
Henderson, Z ;
Greenwood, K ;
Hancock, PJB ;
Burton, AM ;
Miller, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 1999, 5 (04) :339-360
[8]   Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition [J].
Cabeza, R ;
Kato, T .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (05) :429-433
[9]   When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and why? [J].
Campbell, R ;
Coleman, M ;
Walker, J ;
Benson, PJ ;
Wallace, S ;
Michelotti, J ;
Baron-Cohen, S .
VISUAL COGNITION, 1999, 6 (02) :197-216
[10]   Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task [J].
Clutterbuck, R ;
Johnston, RA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 17 (01) :97-116