Turning Simple Span Into Complex Span: Time for Decay or Interference From Distractors?

被引:50
作者
Lewandowsky, Stephan [1 ]
Geiger, Sonja M. [1 ]
Morrell, Daniel B. [1 ]
Oberauer, Klaus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Cognit Psychol, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
working memory; short-term memory; complex-span task; memory models; interference-based forgetting; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; GENERAL FLUID INTELLIGENCE; IMMEDIATE SERIAL-RECALL; WORKING-MEMORY; PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITY; TEMPORAL ISOLATION; IRRELEVANT-SPEECH; ARTICULATORY SUPPRESSION; MODEL; ORDER;
D O I
10.1037/a0019764
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigated the effects of the duration and type of to-be-articulated distractors during encoding of a verbal list into short-term memory (STM). Distractors and to-be-remembered items alternated during list presentation, as in the complex-span task that underlies much of working-memory research. According to an interference model of STM, known as serial order in a box (SOB; Farrell & Lewandowsky, 2002), additional repeated articulations of the same word between list items should cause minimal further disruption of encoding into STM even though the retention interval for early list items is increased. SOB also predicts that the articulation of several different distractor items should lead to much enhanced disruption if the distractor interval is increased. Those predictions were qualitatively confirmed in 4 experiments that found that it is the type of distractors, not their total duration, that determines the success of encoding a list into STM. The results pose a challenge to temporal models of complex-span performance, such as the time-based resource sharing model (Barrouillet, Bernardin, & Camos, 2004). The results add to a growing body of evidence that memory for the short term is not exclusively governed by purely temporal processes.
引用
收藏
页码:958 / 978
页数:21
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   DISTINCTIVE FEATURES, CATEGORICAL PERCEPTION, AND PROBABILITY-LEARNING - SOME APPLICATIONS OF A NEURAL MODEL [J].
ANDERSON, JA ;
SILVERSTEIN, JW ;
RITZ, SA ;
JONES, RS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (05) :413-451
[2]  
BADDELEY A, 1984, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V22, P403
[3]  
Baddeley A. D., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[4]   Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others [J].
Bakeman, R ;
McArthur, D .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1996, 28 (04) :584-589
[5]   STATE-TRACE ANALYSIS - METHOD OF TESTING SIMPLE THEORIES OF CAUSATION [J].
BAMBER, D .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 19 (02) :137-181
[6]   Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans [J].
Barrouillet, P ;
Bernardin, S ;
Camos, V .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (01) :83-100
[7]   Time and cognitive load in working memory [J].
Barrouillet, Pierre ;
Bemardin, Sophie ;
Portrat, Sophie ;
Vergauwe, Evie ;
Camos, Valerie .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (03) :570-585
[8]   Working Memory Span Development: A Time-Based Resource-Sharing Model Account [J].
Barrouillet, Pierre ;
Gavens, Nathalie ;
Vergauwe, Evie ;
Gaillard, Vinciane ;
Camos, Valerie .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 45 (02) :477-490
[9]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[10]   A temporal ratio model of memory [J].
Brown, Gordon D. A. ;
Neath, Ian ;
Chater, Nick .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (03) :539-576