Diabetes Digital App Technology: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. A Consensus Report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group

被引:206
作者
Fleming, G. Alexander [1 ]
Petrie, John R. [2 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [3 ]
Holl, Reinhard W. [4 ]
Peters, Anne L. [5 ]
Heinemann, Lutz [6 ]
机构
[1] Kinexum, Harpers Ferry, WV 25425 USA
[2] Univ Glasgow, Inst Cardiovasc & Med Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Int Diabet Ctr Pk Nicollet, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Ulm, ZIBMT, Inst Epidemiol & Med Biometry, Ulm, Germany
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[6] Sci Consulting Diabet GmbH, Neuss, Germany
关键词
SELF-MANAGEMENT; MOBILE APPS; INTERVENTION; GLUCOSE; PREVENT; DEVICES;
D O I
10.2337/dci19-0062
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Digital health technology, especially digital and health applications ("apps"), have been developing rapidly to help people manage their diabetes. Numerous health-related apps provided on smartphones and other wireless devices are available to support people with diabetes who need to adopt either lifestyle interventions or medication adjustments in response to glucose-monitoring data. However, regulations and guidelines have not caught up with the burgeoning field to standardize how mobile health apps are reviewed and monitored for patient safety and clinical validity. The available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of mobile health apps, especially for diabetes, remains limited. The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have therefore conducted a joint review of the current landscape of available diabetes digital health technology (only stand-alone diabetes apps, as opposed to those that are integral to a regulated medical device, such as insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring systems, and automated insulin delivery systems) and practices of regulatory authorities and organizations. We found that, across the U.S. and Europe, mobile apps intended to manage health and wellness are largely unregulated unless they meet the definition of medical devices for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. International organizations, including the International Medical Device Regulators Forum and the World Health Organization, have made strides in classifying different types of digital health technology and integrating digital health technology into the field of medical devices. As the diabetes digital health field continues to develop and become more fully integrated into everyday life, we wish to ensure that it is based on the best evidence for safety and efficacy. As a result, we bring to light several issues that the diabetes community, including regulatory authorities, policy makers, professional organizations, researchers, people with diabetes, and health care professionals, needs to address to ensure that diabetes health technology can meet its full potential. These issues range from inadequate evidence on app accuracy and clinical validity to lack of training provision, poor interoperability and standardization, and insufficient data security. We conclude with a series of recommended actions to resolve some of these shortcomings.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 260
页数:11
相关论文
共 79 条
[61]   Mobile Health Applications for the Most Prevalent Conditions by the World Health Organization: Review and Analysis [J].
Martinez-Perez, Borja ;
de la Torre-Diez, Isabel ;
Lopez-Coronado, Miguel .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (06)
[62]  
POHL M, 2017, 325 000 MOBILE HLTH
[63]   New technologies for diabetes: a review of the present and the future [J].
Ramchandani, Neesha ;
Heptulla, Rubina A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012,
[64]  
Ristau R.A., 2013, Diabetes Spectrum, V26, P211, DOI DOI 10.2337/DIASPECT.26.4.211
[65]   A systematic review of gamification in e-Health [J].
Sardi, Lamyae ;
Idri, Ali ;
Luis Fernandez-Aleman, Jose .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 71 :31-48
[66]   ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes technologies [J].
Sherr, Jennifer L. ;
Tauschmann, Martin ;
Battelino, Tadej ;
de Bock, Martin ;
Forlenza, Gregory ;
Roman, Rossana ;
Hood, Korey K. ;
Maahs, David M. .
PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2018, 19 :302-325
[67]   Need for a National Evaluation System for Health Technology [J].
Shuren, Jeffrey ;
Califf, Robert M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (11) :1153-1154
[68]   Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. [J].
Tuomilehto, J ;
Lindström, J ;
Eriksson, JG ;
Valle, TT ;
Hamalainen, H ;
Ilanne-Parikka, P ;
Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi, S ;
Laakso, M ;
Louheranta, A ;
Rastas, M ;
Salminen, V ;
Uusitupa, M ;
Aunola, S ;
Cepaitis, Z ;
Moltchanov, V ;
Hakumaki, M ;
Mannelin, M ;
Martikkala, V ;
Sundvall, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (18) :1343-1350
[69]   Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program [J].
Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle M. ;
Beets, Michael W. ;
Moore, Justin B. ;
Kaczynski, Andrew T. ;
Barr-Anderson, Daheia J. ;
Tate, Deborah F. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2013, 20 (03) :513-518
[70]  
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2017, Software as a Medical Device (SAMD). Clinical Evaluation-Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff