Experimental validation of molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers:: A new approach

被引:147
|
作者
Benz, RW
Castro-Román, F
Tobias, DJ [1 ]
White, SH
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.104.046821
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
A novel protocol has been developed for comparing the structural properties of lipid bilayers determined by simulation with those determined by diffraction experiments, which makes it possible to test critically the ability of molecular dynamics simulations to reproduce experimental data. This model-independent method consists of analyzing data from molecular dynamics bilayer simulations in the same way as experimental data by determining the structure factors of the system and, via Fourier reconstruction, the overall transbilayer scattering-density profiles. Multi-nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations of a dioleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer at 66% RH (5.4 waters/lipid) were performed in the constant pressure and temperature ensemble using the united-atom GROMACS and the all-atom CHARMM22/27 force fields with the GROMACS and NAMD software packages, respectively. The quality of the simulated bilayer structures was evaluated by comparing simulation with experimental results for bilayer thickness, area/lipid, individual molecular-component distributions, continuous and discrete structure factors, and overall scattering-density profiles. Neither the GROMACS nor the CHARMM22/27 simulations reproduced experimental data within experimental error. The widths of the simulated terminal methyl distributions showed a particularly strong disagreement with the experimentally observed distributions. A comparison of the older CHARMM22 with the newer CHARMM27 force fields shows that significant progress is being made in the development of atomic force fields for describing lipid bilayer systems empirically.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 817
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Molecular Detailed Simulations of Lipid Bilayers
    Berkowitz, Max L.
    Kindt, James T.
    REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 27, 2011, 27 : 253 - 286
  • [32] Liposomal drug transport: A molecular perspective from molecular dynamics simulations in lipid bilayers
    Xiang, Tian-Xiang
    Anderson, Bradley D.
    ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2006, 58 (12-13) : 1357 - 1378
  • [33] Inclusion of Terpenoid Plant Extracts in Lipid Bilayers Investigated by Molecular Dynamics Simulations
    Witzke, Sarah
    Duelund, Lars
    Kongsted, Jacob
    Petersen, Michael
    Mouritsen, Ole G.
    Khandelia, Himanshu
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2010, 114 (48): : 15825 - 15831
  • [34] Mesoscopic undulations and thickness fluctuations in lipid bilayers from molecular dynamics simulations
    Lindahl, E
    Edholm, O
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 79 (01) : 426 - 433
  • [35] Investigation of finite system size effects in molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers
    Castro-Roman, Francisco
    Benz, Ryan W.
    White, Stephen H.
    Tobias, Douglas J.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2006, 110 (47): : 24157 - 24164
  • [36] Molecular dynamics simulations of charged and neutral lipid bilayers:: treatment of electrostatic interactions
    Róg, T
    Murzyn, K
    Pasenkiewicz-Gierula, M
    ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA, 2003, 50 (03) : 789 - 798
  • [37] Molecular dynamics simulations of complex mixed lipid bilayers to model yeast membranes
    Lim, Joseph B.
    Klauda, Jeffery B.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 238
  • [38] Molecular dynamics simulations of ternary lipid bilayers containing plant sterol and glucosylceramide
    Emami, Shiva
    Azadmard-Damirchi, Sodeif
    Peighambardoust, Seyed Hadi
    Hesari, Javad
    Valizadeh, Hadi
    Faller, Roland
    CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS OF LIPIDS, 2017, 203 : 24 - 32
  • [40] Interleaflet Interaction and Asymmetry in Phase Separated Lipid Bilayers: Molecular Dynamics Simulations
    Perlmutter, Jason D.
    Sachs, Jonathan N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 133 (17) : 6563 - 6577