Five-year outcomes of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Intuity valve

被引:6
作者
Pelce, E. [1 ]
Porto, A. [1 ]
Gariboldi, V. [1 ]
Ben Lagha, A. [1 ]
Amanatiou, C. [1 ]
Collart, F. [1 ]
Theron, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] La Timone Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, F-13005 Marseille, France
关键词
aortic valve replacement; rapid‐ aortic valve deployment; 5‐ year; outcomes; overall mortality; prospective; single‐ center; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS; IMPLANTATION; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; EXPERIENCE; STENOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jocs.15665
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background This report presents 5-year outcomes of the rapid-deployment Edwards Intuity valve in a prospective, single-center study. Methods All patients who underwent an aortic valve replacement (AVR) with an Edwards Intuity bioprosthesis at La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France, from July 2012 to June 2015 were assessed over a 5-year follow-up period. The primary outcome was overall mortality at 5 years. Secondary outcomes were reoperation, overall mortality and stroke, cardiovascular mortality, composite endpoints defined by the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2), periprosthetic regurgitation, prosthesis-patient mismatch, and the need for new pacemaker implantation. Results In total, 170 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 67.1% were males. The mean age was 76 years, mean EuroSCORE II was 3.5% and 5-year overall mortality was 12.4%. At 5 years, reoperation was 2.9%, overall mortality and stroke was 4.1% per patient-year, and cardiovascular mortality was 4.7%. VARC clinical efficacy and VARC time-related valve safety were achieved in 46.0% and 59.9% of patients, respectively. At one month VARC device success was 71.2% and VARC early safety was 87.1%. At one year, mild and moderate periprosthetic regurgitation were 2.4% and 0.6%, respectively, and moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch were 18.8% and 4.8%, respectively. Conduction disturbances needing new PPI occurred in 3.5% patients. Conclusion The 5-year outcomes of AVR with the Edwards Intuity valve system demonstrate satisfactory midterm safety and excellent haemodynamic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:2826 / 2833
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of conventional and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement on the distance from the aortic annulus to coronary arteries
    Coti, Iuliana
    Maierhofer, Udo
    Rath, Claus
    Werner, Paul
    Loewe, Christian
    Kocher, Alfred
    Laufer, Guenther
    Andreas, Martin
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 32 (02) : 196 - 203
  • [42] Aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprosthesis in case of infective endocarditis: a literature review
    Piperata, Antonio
    Azmoun, Alexandre
    Eker, Armand
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 40 (SUPPL 1) : 93 - 99
  • [43] Early surgical outcomes of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves
    Lee, June
    Kim, Yong Han
    Lim, Hyun Ali
    Hong, Seok Beom
    Kim, Do Yeon
    Kim, Hwan Wook
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2024, 16 (09) : 6171 - 6181
  • [44] Transcatheter Versus Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the German Aortic Valve Registry
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Fujita, Buntaro
    Frerker, Christian
    Bauer, Timm
    Beckmann, Andreas
    Bekeredjian, Raffi
    Bleiziffer, Sabine
    Moellmann, Helge
    Walther, Thomas
    Hamm, Christian
    Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
    Zeiher, Andreas
    Gummert, Jan
    Herrmann, Eva
    Borger, Michael A.
    Holzhey, David
    Thiele, Holger
    Ensminger, Stephan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (22) : 2642 - 2654
  • [45] Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement after aortic root replacement: A safe alternative to redo root replacement
    Wilder, Travis J.
    Sharma, Vikas
    Koliopoulou, Antigone
    McKellar, Stephen H.
    Selzman, Craig H.
    Glotzbach, Jason P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (01) : 222 - 225
  • [46] The use of sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve prosthesis in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: A focused review
    King, Morgan
    Stambulic, Thomas
    Payne, Darrin
    Luis Fernandez, Angel
    El-Diasty, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (10) : 3355 - 3362
  • [47] Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement for a Hemodialysis Patient with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Yamamoto, Taira
    Endo, Daisuke
    Yamaoka, Hironobu
    Shimada, Akie
    Matsushita, Satoshi
    Amano, Atsushi
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2021, 24 (03) : E530 - E533
  • [48] Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement
    Romano, Matthew A.
    Koeckert, Michael
    Mumtaz, Mubashir A.
    Slachman, Frank N.
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Chitwood, W. Randolph, Jr.
    Barnhart, Glenn R.
    Grossi, Eugene A.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 106 (03) : 685 - 690
  • [49] Early Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement with Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Prostheses in Dialysis Patients
    Uehara, Hiroo
    Ozawa, Naomi
    Uchiyama, Masateru
    Iwakura, Tomohiro
    Imazuru, Tomohiro
    Shimokawa, Tomoki
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2025, 28 (02) : E205 - E211
  • [50] The sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement international registry: lessons learned from more than 4,500 patients
    Di Eusanio, Marco
    Berretta, Paolo
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 9 (04) : 289 - 297