Five-year outcomes of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Intuity valve

被引:6
|
作者
Pelce, E. [1 ]
Porto, A. [1 ]
Gariboldi, V. [1 ]
Ben Lagha, A. [1 ]
Amanatiou, C. [1 ]
Collart, F. [1 ]
Theron, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] La Timone Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, F-13005 Marseille, France
关键词
aortic valve replacement; rapid‐ aortic valve deployment; 5‐ year; outcomes; overall mortality; prospective; single‐ center; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS; IMPLANTATION; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; EXPERIENCE; STENOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jocs.15665
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background This report presents 5-year outcomes of the rapid-deployment Edwards Intuity valve in a prospective, single-center study. Methods All patients who underwent an aortic valve replacement (AVR) with an Edwards Intuity bioprosthesis at La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France, from July 2012 to June 2015 were assessed over a 5-year follow-up period. The primary outcome was overall mortality at 5 years. Secondary outcomes were reoperation, overall mortality and stroke, cardiovascular mortality, composite endpoints defined by the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2), periprosthetic regurgitation, prosthesis-patient mismatch, and the need for new pacemaker implantation. Results In total, 170 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 67.1% were males. The mean age was 76 years, mean EuroSCORE II was 3.5% and 5-year overall mortality was 12.4%. At 5 years, reoperation was 2.9%, overall mortality and stroke was 4.1% per patient-year, and cardiovascular mortality was 4.7%. VARC clinical efficacy and VARC time-related valve safety were achieved in 46.0% and 59.9% of patients, respectively. At one month VARC device success was 71.2% and VARC early safety was 87.1%. At one year, mild and moderate periprosthetic regurgitation were 2.4% and 0.6%, respectively, and moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch were 18.8% and 4.8%, respectively. Conduction disturbances needing new PPI occurred in 3.5% patients. Conclusion The 5-year outcomes of AVR with the Edwards Intuity valve system demonstrate satisfactory midterm safety and excellent haemodynamic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:2826 / 2833
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One-year outcomes after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
    Young, Christopher
    Laufer, Guenther
    Kocher, Alfred
    Solinas, Marco
    Alamanni, Francesco
    Polvani, Gianluca
    Podesser, Bruno K.
    Aramendi, Jose Ignacio
    Arribas, Jose
    Bouchot, Olivier
    Livi, Ugolino
    Massetti, Massimo
    Terp, Kim
    Giot, Christophe
    Glauber, Mattia
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (02) : 575 - 585
  • [2] Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
    Thuraisingam, Amalan
    Newcomb, Andrew E.
    JTCVS TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 : 219 - 226
  • [3] Current trends in aortic valve replacement: development of the rapid deployment EDWARDS INTUITY valve system
    Borger, Michael A.
    Dohmen, Pascal
    Misfeld, Martin
    Mohr, Friedrich W.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2013, 10 (04) : 461 - 470
  • [4] Pathology-Independent Expansion of Indications for Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Midterm Outcomes
    Bae, Seon Yong
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    Sohn, Suk Ho
    Kang, Yoonjin
    Kim, Ji Seong
    Choi, Jae Woong
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2025,
  • [5] Pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement: rapid-deployment Intuity® compared to conventional bioprostheses
    Herry, Morgane
    Laghlam, Driss
    Touboul, Olivier
    Nguyen, Lee S.
    Estagnasie, Philippe
    Brusset, Alain
    Squara, Pierre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 58 (02) : 335 - 342
  • [6] Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor
    Andreas, Martin
    Wallner, Stephanie
    Habertheuer, Andreas
    Rath, Claus
    Schauperl, Martin
    Binder, Thomas
    Beitzke, Dietrich
    Rosenhek, Raphael
    Loewe, Christian
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Kocher, Alfred
    Laufer, Guenther
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 22 (06) : 799 - 805
  • [7] TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: Performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve
    Barnhart, Glenn R.
    Accola, Kevin D.
    Grossi, Eugene A.
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    Mumtaz, Mubashir A.
    Sabik, Joseph F.
    Slachman, Frank N.
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Borger, Michael A.
    Garrett, H. Edward, Jr.
    Rodriguez, Evelio
    McCarthy, Patrick M.
    Ryan, William H.
    Duhay, Francis G.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Chitwood, W. Randolph, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 153 (02) : 241 - +
  • [8] Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: 1-year outcomes in 150 patients
    Theron, Alexis
    Ravis, Eleonore
    Grisoli, Dominique
    Jaussaud, Nicolas
    Morera, Pierre
    Candolfi, Pascal
    Boleckova, Jana
    Lagier, David
    Amanatiou, Cecile
    Messous, Lyna
    Gariboldi, Vlad
    Collart, Frederic
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 25 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [9] Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus standard bioprosthesis implantation
    Ferrari, Enrico
    Roduit, Christelle
    Salamin, Pauline
    Caporali, Elena
    Demertzis, Stefanos
    Tozzi, Piergiorgio
    Berdajs, Denis
    von Segesser, Ludwig
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2017, 32 (06) : 322 - 327
  • [10] Anterior Right Thoracotomy for Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Laufer, Guenther
    Coti, Iuliana
    Mahr, Stephane
    Scherzer, Sabine
    Haberl, Thomas
    Kocher, Alfred
    Andreas, Martin
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 112 (02) : 564 - 571