The costs of coping with poor water supply in rural Kenya

被引:66
作者
Cook, Joseph [1 ]
Kimuyu, Peter [2 ]
Whittington, Dale [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Daniel J Evans Sch Publ Policy & Governance, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Nairobi, Sch Econ, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
关键词
rural water supply; economic benefits; value of travel time; COUNTRIES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/2015WR017468
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the disease burden of poor access to water and sanitation declines around the world, the nonhealth benefits--mainly the time burden of water collection - will likely grow in importance in sector funding decisions and investment analyses. We measure the coping costs incurred by households in one area of rural Kenya. Sixty percent of the 387 households interviewed were collecting water outside the home, and household members were spending an average of 2-3 h doing so per day. We value these time costs using an individual-level value of travel time estimate based on a stated preference experiment. We compare these results to estimates obtained assuming that the value of time saved is a fraction of unskilled wage rates. Coping cost estimates also include capital costs for storage and rainwater collection, money paid either to water vendors or at sources that charge volumetrically, costs of treating diarrhea cases, and expenditures on drinking water treatment (primarily boiling in our site). Median total coping costs per month are approximately US$20 per month, higher than average household water bills in many utilities in the United States, or 12% of reported monthly cash income. We estimate that coping costs are greater than 10% of income for over half of households in our sample. They are higher among larger and wealthier households, and households whose primary source is not at home. Even households with unprotected private wells or connections to an intermittent piped network spend money on water storage containers and on treating water they recognize as unsafe.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 859
页数:19
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Joint production and averting expenditure measures of willingness to pay: Do water expenditures really measure avoidance costs? [J].
Abrahams, NA ;
Hubbell, BJ ;
Jordan, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (02) :427-437
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, WHO TECHN NOT DRINK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, METH NOT PROP IND FR
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV RESOUR EC, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1014537330423
[5]  
AWWA, 2015, TYP WAT WAST BILLS
[6]  
Cook J., 2015, Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series
[7]  
Filmer D, 2001, DEMOGRAPHY, V38, P115, DOI 10.1353/dem.2001.0003
[8]   Assessing Asset Indices [J].
Filmer, Deon ;
Scott, Kinnon .
DEMOGRAPHY, 2012, 49 (01) :359-392
[9]  
Global Water Partnership, 2015, TECHNICAL REPORT
[10]  
Howard G., 2003, Domestic Water Quantity