Agency, global responsibility, and the speculations of ordinary life

被引:0
作者
Ghazavi, Vafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Balliol Coll, Oxford, England
关键词
Agency; responsibility; injustice; imagination; moral progress;
D O I
10.1080/13698230.2021.1921375
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
There is an abiding scepticism in normative theory that individual responsibility for global injustice lies outside commonsense moral thought because it is not grounded in an intuitive conception of human agency. Despite the grim realities of injustice in an interconnected world, this scepticism holds that human beings cannot properly internalise a nonrestrictive view of responsibility because it cuts against their experience of agency in the world. Against this view, this article argues that individual responsibility for the realisation of global justice is supported by a pervasive, and socio-politically influenced, feature of the phenomenology of agency: moral imagination. Moral imagination connects actions which are within the domain of an ordinary life to larger projects of social and political change. Since there is no compelling reason for the scope of those projects to be restricted, there is an accessible understanding and experience of the phenomenology of agency which grounds individual global responsibility in the real world. I call this a dynamic phenomenology of agency.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 587
页数:24
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Cohen GA, 2008, Rescuing Justice and Equality, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674029651
[2]  
Cvijanovic H, 2007, POLIT MISAO, V44, P162
[3]  
Dewey J., 1980, JOHN DEWEY, P1
[4]  
DEWEY John, 1989, The Later Works of John Dewey, V10
[5]   Cosmopolitan Patriotism as a Civic Ideal [J].
Erez, Lior ;
Laborde, Cecile .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 64 (01) :191-203
[6]  
Fesmire S., 2003, JOHN DEWEY MORAL IMA
[7]   Abnormal justice [J].
Fraser, Nancy .
CRITICAL INQUIRY, 2008, 34 (03) :393-422
[8]  
Geuss R, 2010, POLITICS AND THE IMAGINATION, P1
[9]  
Gilabert Pablo., 2017, Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates, P95, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780190280598.003.0006
[10]   Fieldwork in Political Theory: Five Arguments for an Ethnographic Sensibility [J].
Herzog, Lisa ;
Zacka, Bernardo .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 49 (02) :763-784