Got Volunteers? Association of Hospice Use of Volunteers With Bereaved Family Members' Overall Rating of the Quality of End-of-Life Care

被引:42
作者
Block, Eve M. [1 ]
Casarett, David J. [2 ]
Spence, Carol [3 ]
Gozalo, Pedro [1 ]
Connor, Stephen R. [3 ]
Teno, Joan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Sch Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Natl Hosp & Palliat Care Org, Alexandria, VA USA
关键词
Hospice; quality of care; volunteers; consumer perception; ratings of the quality of care; variation; HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; PALLIATIVE CARE; NATIONAL-SURVEY; WORKING; UK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.11.310
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Volunteers are a key component of hospice, and they are required by Medicare conditions of participation in the United States. Yet, little is known about the impact of volunteers in hospice. Objectives. The goal of this study was to characterize whether bereaved family members in hospice programs with increased use of volunteer hours per patient day report higher overall satisfaction with hospice services. Methods. A secondary analysis of the 2006 Family Evaluation of Hospice Care data repository with hospice organization data regarding the number of volunteer hours in direct patient care and the total number of patient days served. A multivariate model examined the association of institutional rate of bereaved family members stating end-of-life care was excellent with that of hospices' rate of volunteer hours per patient day, controlling for other organizational characteristics. Results. Three hundred five hospice programs (67% freestanding and 20.7% for profit) submitted 57,353 surveys in 2006 (54.2% female decedents and 47.4% with cancer). Hospice programs reported on average 0.71 hours per patient week (25th percentile: 0.245 hours per patient week; 75th percentile: 0.91 volunteer hours per patient week; and 99th percentile: 3.3 hours per patient week). Those hospice programs in the highest quartile of volunteer usage had higher overall satisfaction compared with those in the lowest-quartile usage of volunteers (75.8% reported excellent overall quality of care compared with 67.8% reporting excellent in the lowest quartile. After adjustment for hospice program characteristics, hospice programs in the highest quartile had highest overall rating of the quality of care (coefficient = 0.06, 95% confidence interval = 0.04, 0.09). Conclusion. In this cross-sectional study, hospice programs with higher use of volunteers per patient day were associated with bereaved family member reports that the hospice program quality of care was excellent. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;39:502-506. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 506
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   A national survey of health professionals and volunteers working in voluntary hospices in the UK. II. Staff and volunteers' experiences of working in hospices [J].
Addington-Hall, JM ;
Karlsen, S .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (01) :49-57
[2]   A national survey of health professionals and volunteers working in voluntary hospice services in the UK. I. Attitudes to current issues affecting hospices and palliative care [J].
Addington-Hall, JM ;
Karlsen, S .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (01) :40-48
[3]  
Claxton-Oldfield Stephen, 2007, Am J Hosp Palliat Care, V24, P259, DOI 10.1177/1049909106298398
[4]   Family evaluation of hospice care: Results from voluntary submission of data via website [J].
Connor, SR ;
Teno, J ;
Spence, C ;
Smith, N .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2005, 30 (01) :9-17
[5]   Measuring hospice care: The national hospice and palliative care organization national hospice data set [J].
Connor, SR ;
Tecca, M ;
LundPerson, J ;
Teno, J .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2004, 28 (04) :316-328
[6]  
Mor V, 1983, Eval Health Prof, V6, P453, DOI 10.1177/016327878300600406
[7]  
Steinhauser K E, 2000, Hosp J, V15, P35
[8]   Validation of toolkit after-death bereaved family member interview [J].
Teno, JM ;
Clarridge, B ;
Casey, V ;
Edgman-Levitan, S ;
Fowler, J .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2001, 22 (03) :752-758