Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to assess radiation therapy response for head and neck paragangliomas

被引:15
作者
Ota, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Liao, Eric [1 ]
Kurokawa, Ryo [1 ]
Syed, Faiz [1 ]
Baba, Akira [1 ]
Kurokawa, Mariko [1 ]
Moritani, Toshio [1 ]
Srinivasan, Ashok [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,UHB2, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
DCE‐ MRI; DWI; head and neck; paraganglioma; radiation therapy; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; COEFFICIENT VALUES; BENIGN; DIFFERENTIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PERMEABILITY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/jon.12875
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose The prediction of radiotherapy outcome in head and neck paragangliomas is clinically important. We investigated perfusion and diffusion markers for evaluation of response to radiotherapy of head and neck paragangliomas. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 330 consecutive patients from January 2016 to September 2019 with suspected head and neck paragangliomas, and enrolled 11 patients (2 males, 9 females; age: 55.2 +/- 10.3 years) who had conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI before and after radiation therapy. Radiation therapy, consisting of external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiotherapy, was conducted at the radiation oncology department in a single center. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), normalized mean ADC, and parameters of DCE-MRI were compared between pre- and post-treatment status by paired t-test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for the relationship between tumor volume ratio (post-treatment status/pre-treatment status) and pre-treatment and post-treatment values. Results Mean and normalized ADC values were statistically higher in post-treatment status than pre-treatment status (p = 0.005, p = 0.005, respectively), and Ktrans (volume transfer constant between extravascular, extracellular space [EES], and blood plasma per minute) and Kep (rate transfer constant between EES and blood plasma per minute) were significantly lower in post-treatment status than pre-treatment status (p = 0.007, p = 0.027, respectively). The correlation coefficient of the relationship between tumor volume ratio and pre-treatment Ktrans (r = 0.70; p = 0.016) and between tumor volume ratio and post-treatment Ktrans and Kep (r = 0.83; p = 0.002, r = 0.8; p = 0.003, respectively) was statistically significant. Conclusions Ktrans has predictive potential to predict the response to radiation therapy of head and neck paragangliomas.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1043
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feasibility study of dual parametric 2D histogram analysis of breast lesions with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI
    Yanqiong Chen
    Bin Wu
    Hui Liu
    Dan Wang
    Yajia Gu
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 16
  • [42] Small-bowel MRI in children and young adults with Crohn disease: retrospective head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI
    Henning Neubauer
    Thomas Pabst
    Anke Dick
    Wolfram Machann
    Laura Evangelista
    Clemens Wirth
    Herbert Köstler
    Dietbert Hahn
    Meinrad Beer
    Pediatric Radiology, 2013, 43 : 103 - 114
  • [43] Detection of soft-tissue abscess: Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging to contrast-enhanced MRI
    Chun, Chang Woo
    Jung, Joon-Yong
    Baik, Jun Seung
    Jee, Won-Hee
    Kim, Sun Ki
    Shin, Seung Han
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [44] Diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI and semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Zhou, S. C.
    Wang, Y. J.
    Ai, T.
    Huang, L.
    Zhu, T. T.
    Zhu, W. Z.
    Xia, L. M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (05) : 409.e7 - 409.e16
  • [45] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and ADC Mapping of Head-and-Neck Paragangliomas - Initial Experience
    Aschenbach, Rene
    Basche, Steffen
    Vogl, Thomas Josef
    Klisch, Joachim
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 215 - 219
  • [46] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Evaluates the Early Response of Human Head and Neck Tumor Xenografts Following Anti-EMMPRIN Therapy With Cisplatin or Irradiation
    Kim, Hyunki
    Hartman, Yolanda E.
    Zhai, Guihua
    Chung, Thomas K.
    Korb, Melissa L.
    Beasley, Timothy M.
    Zhou, Tong
    Rosenthal, Eben L.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (04) : 936 - 945
  • [47] Contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T to assess early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Ni, Lianping
    Liu, Ying
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (04) : 5294 - 5300
  • [48] Prediction of Response to Chemoradiation Therapy in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging
    Kim, S.
    Loevner, L. A.
    Quon, H.
    Kilger, A.
    Sherman, E.
    Weinstein, G.
    Chalian, A.
    Poptani, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (02) : 262 - 268
  • [49] Standard diffusion-weighted, intravoxel incoherent motion, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of musculoskeletal tumours: correlations with Ki67 proliferation status
    Zhan, J.
    Hao, D.
    Wang, D.
    Yue, B.
    Zhou, R.
    Tian, N.
    Liu, M.
    Gao, C.
    Xu, W.
    Cui, J.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 76 (12) : 941.e11 - 941.e18
  • [50] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for head and neck cancers
    Elhalawani, Hesham
    Ger, Rachel B.
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    Awan, Musaddiq J.
    Ding, Yao
    Li, Kimberly
    Fave, Xenia J.
    Beers, Andrew L.
    Driscoll, Brandon
    Hormuth, David A., II
    van Houdt, Petra J.
    He, Renjie
    Zhou, Shouhao
    Mathieu, Kelsey B.
    Li, Heng
    Coolens, Catherine
    Chung, Caroline
    Bankson, James A.
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Jihong
    Sandulache, Vlad C.
    Lai, Stephen Y.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Stafford, R. Jason
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Barboriak, Daniel P.
    Hazle, John D.
    Court, Laurence E.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5