Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of a Busulfan Test Dose in Adult Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

被引:19
作者
Weil, Elizabeth [1 ]
Zook, Felicia [1 ]
Oxencis, Carolyn [1 ]
Canadeo, Angela [1 ]
Urmanski, Angela [2 ]
Waggoner, Mindy [1 ]
Eastwood, Daniel [3 ]
Pasquini, Marcelo [4 ]
Hamadani, Mehdi [4 ]
Hari, Parameswaran [4 ]
机构
[1] Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Hematol Oncol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[2] Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Invest Drug Serv, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Biostat, Milwaukee, WI USA
[4] Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Adult Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, Hematol Malignancies, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Busulfan; Myeloablative; Allogeneic; Transplantation; VERSUS-HOST-DISEASE; INTRAVENOUS BUSULFAN; PROPHYLAXIS; REGIMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.02.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Owing to interpatient variability in busulfan exposure, therapeutic monitoring of busulfan is often used in myeloablative allogeneic transplantation to ensure that patients are near the optimal steady-state goal of 900 ng/mL. One challenge in therapeutic monitoring of busulfan is the brief course of busulfan treatment, requiring prompt analysis and dose adjustments as needed. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a busulfan test dose before the start of the conditioning regimen would allow for all conditioning regimen doses to be given at the calculated optimized dose. An observational study was completed to evaluate the effects of a busulfan test dose of 0.9 mg/kg administered before the start of a myeloablative intravenous busulfan-based conditioning regimen. Sixty adult patients who received a busulfan conditioning regimen were reviewed, including 30 patients prior to the implementation of the busulfan test dose (pretest dose group) and 30 patients who received the busulfan test dose (posttest dose group). The primary objective was a pharmacokinetic evaluation of the percentage of patients who achieved the desired steady-state goal using the test dose strategy. The safety and efficacy of the busulfan test dose were evaluated as well. The average busulfan steady-state level after the first dose of the conditioning regimen was significantly lower in the pre-test dose group compared with the post-test dose group (660 ng/mL versus 879.9 ng/mL; P < 0.001). Compared with the post-test dose group, significantly fewer patients in the pre-test dose group were within 10% of the busulfan steady-state goal (10% versus 73.3%; P < 0.001) or within 5% of the goal (0% versus 53%; P < 0.001). Requirements for par enteral nutrition and/or patient-controlled analgesia owing to mucositis and rates of veno-occlusive disease were not significantly different between the pre-test dose group and the post-test dose group. The rates of disease relapse, mortality, and acute graft-versus-host disease were similar in the two groups. A pretransplantation busulfan test dose of 0.9 mg/kg improved the patients' ability to reach therapeutic busulfan target levels after the first conditioning dose and resulted in fewer adjustments during conditioning. The use of a busulfan test dose did not significantly increase patients' risk of mucositis or other safety outcomes. 2017 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:952 / 957
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Busulfan systemic exposure relative to regimen-related toxicity and acute graft-versus-host disease: Defining a therapeutic window for IV BuCy2 in chronic myelogenous leukemia
    Andersson, BS
    Thall, PF
    Madden, T
    Couriel, D
    Wang, XM
    Tran, HT
    Anderlini, P
    de Lima, M
    Gajewski, J
    Champlin, RE
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (09) : 477 - 485
  • [2] Reliability of a pretransplant i.v. BU test dose performed 2 weeks before myeloablative FluBu conditioning regimen
    Beri, R.
    Chunduri, S.
    Sweiss, K.
    Peace, D. J.
    Mactal-Haaf, C.
    Dobogai, L. C.
    Shord, S.
    Quigley, J. G.
    Chen, Y. H.
    Mahmud, N.
    Rondelli, D.
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 45 (02) : 249 - 253
  • [3] Busulfan in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
    Ciurea, Stefan O.
    Andersson, Borje S.
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (05) : 523 - 536
  • [4] ESP Pharma Inc, 2007, BUS
  • [5] Phenytoin Versus Levetiracetam for Busulfan-Induced Seizure Prophylaxis and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes
    Farhan, Shatha
    Neme, Klodiana
    Mikulandric, Nancy
    Pelland, Danielle
    Wautelet, Susan
    Szymanski, Sarah
    Ruemenapp, Kenneth
    Trapp, Mary Ann
    Peres, Edward
    Janakiraman, Nalini
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 (02) : S221 - S221
  • [6] Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Atorvastatin-Based Acute Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (aGVHD) Prophylaxis in Recipients of HLA-Matched Related Donor (MRD) and Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT)
    Hamadani, Mehdi
    Pasquini, Marcelo C.
    Visotcky, Alexis
    Ahn, Kwang Woo
    Horowitz, Mary M.
    Boyd, Jennifer
    Rizzo, J. Douglas
    Saber, Wael
    Drobyski, William
    Arce-lara, Carlos
    D'Souza, Anita
    Fenske, Timothy S.
    Cumpston, Aaron
    Bunner, Pamela
    Craig, Michael
    Hari, Parameswaran N.
    Kanate, Abraham S.
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 22 (03) : S47 - S48
  • [7] Pharmacokinetics of a test dose of intravenous busulfan guide dose modifications to achieve an optimal area under the curve of a single daily dose of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    Kletzel, M
    Jacobsohn, D
    Duerst, R
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 12 (04) : 472 - 479
  • [8] Busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting
    McCune, Jeannine S.
    Holmberg, Leona A.
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 5 (08) : 957 - 969
  • [9] Plasma concentration monitoring of busulfan - Does it improve clinical outcome?
    McCune, JS
    Gibbs, JP
    Slattery, JT
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2000, 39 (02) : 155 - 165
  • [10] SCHULER U, 1994, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V14, P759