Critical evaluation of the modified-adult immersion test with discriminating dose bioassay for Boophilus microplus using American and Australian isolates

被引:63
作者
Jonsson, N. N. [1 ]
Miller, R. J.
Robertson, J. L.
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Vet Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] USDA ARS, Cattle Fever Tick Res Lab, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
[3] LeOra Software, Petaluma, CA 94952 USA
关键词
Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus; coumaphos; amitraz; cypermethrin; moxidectin; resistance; acaricide;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.02.031
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
Similar adult immersion tests (AlTs) for acaricide susceptibility of Boophilus microplus were done in Texas, USA (Munoz strain) and in Queensland, Australia (N-strain and Ultimo isolates). Engorged adult female ticks were immersed in one of a series of dilutions of commercial acaricide in water and then incubated at room temperature for 7 days. Data on oviposition were collected 7 days after exposure to acaricide and subjected to probit analysis. For most data, we observed poor fit to the probit model. Substantial differences in both LC50 and LC99 for the susceptible strains occurred between the respective laboratories and confidence intervals for all acaricides and all strains were unacceptably wide. For amitraz, the discriminating concentration (double the LC99.9 or LC99) recommended by FAO was 0.25%, but our estimates ranged from 0.46% to 9000%. For cypermethrin, the recommended DD was 0.0050%, with our estimates ranging from 0.00022% to 0.74%. For coumaphos the recommended DD was 0.50% but our estimates ranged from 0.66% to 130%. Finally, for moxidectin, the recommended DD was 0.10%, while our estimates ranged from <0.0001% to 5.9%. The method does not provide a means to discriminate between amitraz-susceptible and -resistant, nor between cypermethrin- susceptible and -resistant B. microplus. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 315
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   Tests to determine LC50 and discriminating doses for macrocyclic lactones against the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus [J].
Sabatini, GA ;
Kemp, DH ;
Hughes, S ;
Nari, A ;
Hansen, J .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2001, 95 (01) :53-62
[12]  
SHAR RD, 1966, B ENTOMOL RES, V53, P563
[13]  
STONE B. F., 1962, BULL ENTOMOL RES, V53, P563
[14]   AN ARSENIC-RESISTANT TICK AND ITS CONTROL WITH GAMMEXANE DIPS [J].
WHITNALL, ABM ;
BRADFORD, B .
BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1947, 38 (02) :353-+
[15]  
2004, LE ORA SOFTWARE