Diagnostic performance of combined use of automated breast volume scanning & hand-held ultrasound for breast lesions

被引:5
作者
Liu, Jialin [1 ]
Zhou, Yang [2 ]
Wu, Jialing [2 ]
Li, Peng [1 ]
Liang, Xinyu [1 ]
Duan, Haonan [1 ]
Wu, Xueqing [1 ]
Hou, Xiukun [2 ]
Li, Xiaofeng [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Ultrasound, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Med Univ, Dalian 116044, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Automated breast volume scanner; breast cancer; breast imaging-reporting and data system; hand-held ultrasound; ultrasound; BI-RADS; CANCER; DIFFERENTIATION; BENIGN;
D O I
10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_836_19
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background & objectives: Breast cancer being one of the most common malignant tumours among women, diagnostic modalities for early detection of the same become of paramount importance. In this context, the hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) could provide valuable information for clinicians to diagnose breast diseases. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the diagnostic performance of combined use of HHUS and ABVS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods: A total of 361 female patients, who underwent both HHUS and ABVS examinations were included in this study. ABVS and HHUS images were interpreted using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). The distributions of the BI-RADS categories and pathology results were shown as specific numbers. Kappa coefficients test (.) was calculated to compare the diagnostic results amongst the ABVS, HHUS and ABVS combined with HHUS. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the three diagnostic methods were calculated and their respective diagnostic performance was analyzed by receiver operator characteristic curve. Results: Of a total of 431 lesions, 153 (35.5%) were malignant and 278 (64.5%) were benign. With respect to the pathology results, the value of. was 0.713 (P<0.001) for HHUS,.=0.765 (P<0.001) for ABVS and.=0.815 (P<0.001) for HHUS+ABVS. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for HHUS combined with ABVS were 96.08 (147/153), 88.49 (246/278), 91.18 (393/431), 82.12 (147/179) and 97.62 per cent (246/252) respectively. For HHUS, these were 90.20 (138/153), 84.17 (234/278), 86.31 (372/431), 75.82 (138/182) and 93.98 per cent (234/249) respectively; and for ABVS these were 92.16 (141/153), 87.05 (242/278), 88.86 (383/431), 79.66 (141/177) and 95.28 per cent (242/254), respectively. There was no significant difference amongst these three methods, but the diagnostic performance of HHUS combined with ABVS was better than, or at least equal to, that of HHUS or ABVS alone. Interpretation & conclusions: The results of this study suggest that ABVS is a promising and advantageous modality for breast cancer detection. Furthermore, the combination of HHUS and ABVS showed a more comparable diagnostic performance than HHUS or ABVS alone for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 354
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, ACR BI RADS ATL
  • [2] Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations
    Barr, Richard G.
    DeVita, Robert
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Manzoni, Federica
    De Silvestri, Annalisa
    Tinelli, Carmine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (10) : 2087 - 2092
  • [3] Updated results of the Gothenburg Trial of Mammographic Screening
    Bjurstam, Nils G.
    Bjorneld, Lena M.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    [J]. CANCER, 2016, 122 (12) : 1832 - 1835
  • [4] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AUTOMATED BREAST 3-D ULTRASOUND AND HANDHELD B-MODE ULTRASOUND FOR DIFFERENTIATION OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BREAST MASSES
    Chen, Lin
    Chen, Yue
    Diao, Xue-Hong
    Fang, Liang
    Pang, Yun
    Cheng, Ai-Qun
    Li, Wei-Ping
    Wang, Yi
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (10) : 1735 - 1742
  • [5] Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound
    Choi, Eun Jung
    Choi, Hyemi
    Park, Eun Hae
    Song, Ji Soo
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 99 : 138 - 145
  • [6] Comparison of Automated Breast Volume Scanning and Hand-Held Ultrasound in the Detection of Breast Cancer: an Analysis of 5,566 Patient Evaluations
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Kim, Hyunji
    Chae, Eun Young
    Hong, Min Ji
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (21) : 9101 - 9105
  • [7] Comparison between different imaging techniques in the evaluation of malignant breast lesions: can 3D ultrasound be useful?
    Clauser, Paola
    Londero, Viviana
    Como, Giuseppe
    Girometti, Rossano
    Bazzocchi, Massimo
    Zuiani, Chiara
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (04): : 240 - 248
  • [8] Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in Women
    Coughlin, Steven S.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER METASTASIS AND DRUG RESISTANCE: CHALLENGES AND PROGRESS, 2ND EDITION, 2019, 1152 : 9 - 29
  • [9] D'Angelo A, 2019, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V23, P225, DOI 10.26355/eurrev_201901_16768
  • [10] Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods
    Ferlay, J.
    Colombet, M.
    Soerjomataram, I.
    Mathers, C.
    Parkin, D. M.
    Pineros, M.
    Znaor, A.
    Bray, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 144 (08) : 1941 - 1953