Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Liang, Hao [1 ]
Xiong, Zhiyong [2 ]
Li, Ying [3 ]
Kong, Weihao [4 ]
Yao, Zhicheng [2 ]
Li, Ruixi [1 ]
Deng, Meihai [1 ]
Hu, Kunpeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Emergency Surg, Hefei 230022, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS; BINDING-FACTOR PINX1; DECREASED EXPRESSION; HOMOZYGOUS DELETION; PROSTATE-CANCER; GASTRIC-CANCER; PROTEIN; TELOMERES; GENE; TUMORIGENESIS;
D O I
10.1155/2018/4621015
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
PINX1 (Pin2/TRF1 interacting protein X1, an intrinsic telomerase inhibitor and putative tumor suppressor gene) may represent a novel prognostic tumor biomarker. However, the results of previous studies are inconsistent and the prognostic value of PINX1 remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether PINX1 expression is associated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with malignant tumors. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases in April 2018. Quality assessment was performed according to the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95.0% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the relationship between PINX1 expression and OS, DSS, DFS/RFS, and clinicopathological characteristics. Due to the heterogeneity across the included studies, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Fixed-effects models were used when the heterogeneity was not significant and random-effects models were used when the heterogeneity was significant. Fourteen studies of 16 cohorts including 2,624 patients were enrolled. Low PINX1 expression was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.51, 95.0% CI: 1.03-2.20; P = 0.035) and DFS/RFS (HR: 1.78, 95.0% CI: 1.28-2.47; P = 0.001) but not DSS (HR: 0.80, 95.0% CI: 0.38-1.67; P = 0.548). Low PINX1 expression was also associated with lymphatic invasion (OR: 2.23, 95.0% CI: 1.35-3.70; P = 0.002) and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage (OR: 2.43, 95.0% CI: 1.29-4.57; P = 0.006). No significant associations were observed between low PINX1 expression and sex, depth of invasion, grade of differentiation, and distant metastasis. Low PINX1 expression was associated with poor OS and DFS/RFS and lymphatic invasion and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage, suggesting that PINX1 expression may be a useful predictor of prognosis in patients with malignant tumors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of Ki-67 in Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Qixin
    Peng, Ziheng
    Shen, Liangfang
    Shen, Lin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [42] Mutation analysis of the PinX1 gene in medulloblastoma.
    Ng, H
    Pang, JCS
    Yin, X
    Chang, Q
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2002, 61 (05): : 449 - 449
  • [43] Prognostic Value of MicroRNA-125 in Various Human Malignant Neoplasms: a Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Xiaoxi
    Zhang, Shanshan
    Ma, Xiaoling
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2015, 61 (11) : 1667 - 1674
  • [44] Clinicopathological and prognostic value of SIRT6 in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis and TCGA data review
    Wu, Xiaojing
    Wang, Shuyuan
    Zhao, Xuanzhu
    Lai, Sizhen
    Yuan, Zhen
    Zhan, Yixiang
    Ni, Kemin
    Liu, Zhaoce
    Liu, Lina
    Xin, Ran
    Zhou, Xingyu
    Yin, Xin
    Liu, Xinyu
    Zhang, Xipeng
    Cui, Wei
    Zhang, Chunze
    CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [45] Clinicopathological and prognostic value of SIRT6 in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis and TCGA data review
    Xiaojing Wu
    Shuyuan Wang
    Xuanzhu Zhao
    Sizhen Lai
    Zhen Yuan
    Yixiang Zhan
    Kemin Ni
    Zhaoce Liu
    Lina Liu
    Ran Xin
    Xingyu Zhou
    Xin Yin
    Xinyu Liu
    Xipeng Zhang
    Wei Cui
    Chunze Zhang
    Cancer Cell International, 22
  • [46] Clinicopathological and prognostic value of lncRNA PANDAR expression in solid tumors: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mehrad-Majd, Hassan
    Akhtari, Javad
    Haerian, Monir-Sadat
    Ravanshad, Yalda
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 234 (04) : 4206 - 4216
  • [47] Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of Rac1 in Cancer Survival: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis
    Lou, Shu
    Wang, Penglai
    Yang, Jianrong
    Ma, Junqing
    Liu, Chao
    Zhou, Meng
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (14): : 2571 - 2579
  • [48] The clinicopathological and prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Ni, X.
    Sun, X.
    Wang, D.
    Chen, Y.
    Zhang, Y.
    Li, W.
    Wang, L.
    Suo, J.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (05): : 674 - 686
  • [49] Clinicopathological and Prognostic Value of Gastric Carcinoma Highly Expressed Transcript 1 in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Xi
    Fan, Yanghua
    He, Yu
    Mou, Anna
    Wang, Fu
    Liu, Yong
    Wu, Zhen
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [50] Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of Programmed Death Ligand-1 in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Guo, Yawen
    Yu, Pan
    Liu, Zeming
    Maimaiti, Yusufu
    Wang, Shan
    Yin, Xingjie
    Liu, Chunping
    Huang, Tao
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):