Fairness in Measurement and Selection: Statistical, Philosophical, and Public Perspectives

被引:0
作者
Zwick, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
admissions; fairness; selection; BIAS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Selection decisions have a major impact on our education, occupation, and quality of life, and the role of standardized tests in selection has always been a source of controversy. Here, I consider various definitions of fairness in measurement and selection-those emerging from within educational measurement and statistics, those from philosophy, and finally, those from the public. I use examples of public challenges to selection practices to illustrate the fact that technical and philosophical definitions of fairness do not align well with public concerns. I emphasize the importance of promoting awareness of existing standards, advocating for the fair use of testing and selection practices, and communicating in a candid and straightforward way when engaging with test takers and test users.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 41
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [51] Young J.W., 2004, Rethinking the SAT: The future of standardized testing in university admissions, P289
  • [52] Zwick R., 2017, Who gets in? Strategies for fair and effective college admissions
  • [53] Zwick R., 2016, Fairness in educational assessment and measurement, V4, P267, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315774527-17
  • [54] Zwick R., 2016, Chronicle of Higher Education
  • [55] The Effect of High School Socioeconomic Status on the Predictive Validity of SAT Scores and High School Grade-Point Average
    Zwick, Rebecca
    Himelfarb, Igor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2011, 48 (02) : 101 - 121