Fairness in Measurement and Selection: Statistical, Philosophical, and Public Perspectives

被引:0
作者
Zwick, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
admissions; fairness; selection; BIAS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Selection decisions have a major impact on our education, occupation, and quality of life, and the role of standardized tests in selection has always been a source of controversy. Here, I consider various definitions of fairness in measurement and selection-those emerging from within educational measurement and statistics, those from philosophy, and finally, those from the public. I use examples of public challenges to selection practices to illustrate the fact that technical and philosophical definitions of fairness do not align well with public concerns. I emphasize the importance of promoting awareness of existing standards, advocating for the fair use of testing and selection practices, and communicating in a candid and straightforward way when engaging with test takers and test users.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 41
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Anastasi A., 1968, PSYCHOL TESTING
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, ED MEASUREMENT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, FAIRNESS ED ASSESSME
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, ETS standards for quality and fairness
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, GRE: Guide to the use of scores
  • [7] Aristotle, 2005, POLITICS
  • [8] DEFUNIS RECONSIDERED - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE ADMISSIONS STRATEGIES
    BRELAND, HM
    IRONSON, GH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1976, 13 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [9] Buck T., 1969, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, P5
  • [10] Camilli G., 2006, ED MEASUREMENT, P221