DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing

被引:181
|
作者
Xue, Chaoyou [1 ,2 ]
Greene, Eric C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biophys, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Tianjin Inst Ind Biotechnol, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; HOMOLOGY-DIRECTED REPAIR; MOLECULE IMAGING REVEALS; RNA-GUIDED ENDONUCLEASE; END RESECTION; CRISPR-CAS; OFF-TARGET; POLY(ADP-RIBOSE) POLYMERASE-1; HALOFERAX-MEDITERRANEI; EXONUCLEASE ACTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Many clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9)-based genome editing technologies take advantage of Cas nucleases to induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at desired locations within a genome. Further processing of the DSBs by the cellular DSB repair machinery is then necessary to introduce desired mutations, sequence insertions, or gene deletions. Thus, the accuracy and efficiency of genome editing are influenced by the cellular DSB repair pathways. DSBs are themselves highly genotoxic lesions and as such cells have evolved multiple mechanisms for their repair. These repair pathways include homologous recombination (HR), classical nonhomologous end joining (cNHEJ), microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA). In this review, we briefly highlight CRISPR-Cas9 and then describe the mechanisms of DSB repair. Finally, we summarize recent findings of factors that can influence the choice of DNA repair pathway in response to Cas9-induced DSBs.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 656
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors
    Anzalone, Andrew V.
    Koblan, Luke W.
    Liu, David R.
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 38 (07) : 824 - 844
  • [42] CRISPR/Cas9: A powerful tool for crop genome editing
    Song, Gaoyuan
    Jia, Meiling
    Chen, Kai
    Kong, Xingchen
    Khattak, Bushra
    Xie, Chuanxiao
    Li, Aili
    Mao, Long
    CROP JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (02): : 75 - 82
  • [43] Methods for Optimizing CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Specificity
    Tycko, Josh
    Myer, Vic E.
    Hsu, Patrick D.
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2016, 63 (03) : 355 - 370
  • [44] Highly Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
    Maguire, Jean Ann
    Gadue, Paul
    French, Deborah L.
    CURRENT PROTOCOLS, 2022, 2 (11):
  • [45] Progresses of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in forage crops
    Haq, Syed Inzimam Ul
    Zheng, Dianfeng
    Feng, Naijie
    Jiang, Xingyu
    Qiao, Feng
    He, Jin-Sheng
    Qiu, Quan-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 279
  • [46] A Cloning-Free Method for CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Fission Yeast
    Zhang, Xiao-Ran
    He, Jia-Bei
    Wang, Yi-Zheng
    Du, Li-Lin
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2018, 8 (06): : 2067 - 2077
  • [47] Comparison of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated megabase-scale genome deletion methods in mouse embryonic stem cells
    Miyata, Masayuki
    Yoshida, Junko
    Takagishi, Itsuki
    Horie, Kyoji
    DNA RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (01)
  • [48] CRISPR-Cas system: a precise tool for plant genome editing
    Saraswat, Pooja
    Ranjan, Rajiv
    NUCLEUS-INDIA, 2022, 65 (01): : 81 - 98
  • [49] The Rise of CRISPR/Cas for Genome Editing in Stem Cells
    Shui, Bing
    Matias, Liz Hernandez
    Guo, Yi
    Peng, Ying
    STEM CELLS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [50] CRISPR-Cas9-mediated IncF plasmid curing in extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli
    Chen, Liang
    Peirano, Gisele
    Yen, Kelly
    Wang, Bingjie
    Terlecky, Austin
    DeVinney, Rebekah
    Kreiswirth, Barry N.
    Pitout, Johann D. D.
    Papp-Wallace, Krisztina M.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (01):