Systematic evaluation of the determinants of defibrillation efficacy

被引:9
作者
Nanthakumar, K
Newman, D
Paquette, M
Dorian, P
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
关键词
defibrillation; electrophysiology; tachyarrhythmias;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.10.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES We studied the effect of varying shock capacitance, shock impedance, and pulse duration on defibrillation efficacy in a randomized, crossover manner for biphasic shocks. BACKGROUND The relationship between the electrical determinants of defibrillation efficacy is incompletely understood. METHODS Biphasic shocks were delivered to 12 dogs through epicardial patches (to vary impedance) after 15 seconds of ventricular fibrillation using one of 100- or 155-muF capacitors at each of four pulse durations (2.5, 5, 10, 20 ms), in a balanced random order. There were two impedance groups: six with higher impedance (mean 97 +/- 15 Omega, range 80-120) and six with lower impedance (mean 39 +/- 3 Omega, range 34 - 44). Voltage requirements were estimated as the average of three defibrillation threshold (DFT) tests. RESULTS Shock capacitance, resistance, and pulse duration all had significant effects upon the minimum voltage DFT (P = .0065, P = .0066, and P = .0001, respectively). The tilt associated with the lowest voltage and current requirement for each of the four capacitance/resistance combinations varied widely, between 34 +/- 5% and 63 +/- 3%, depending on capacitance and impedance. The optimal pulse duration associated with minimum DFT lies between 5.11 and 5.34 ms. CONCLUSIONS Defibrillation voltage requirements for biphasic shocks are affected by pulse duration, capacitance and impedance, but not "tilt".
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   EFFECT OF PENTOBARBITAL ANESTHESIA ON VENTRICULAR DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD IN DOGS [J].
BABBS, CF .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1978, 95 (03) :331-337
[2]   THE PROBABILITY OF DEFIBRILLATION SUCCESS AND THE INCIDENCE OF POSTSHOCK ARRHYTHMIA AS A FUNCTION OF SHOCK STRENGTH [J].
CATES, AW ;
WOLF, PD ;
HILLSLEY, RE ;
SOUZA, JJ ;
SMITH, WM ;
IDEKER, RE .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (07) :1208-1217
[3]   A conceptual basis for defibrillation waveforms [J].
Cleland, BG .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (08) :1186-1195
[4]   Gross and microscopic pathological changes associated with nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator leads [J].
Epstein, AE ;
Kay, GN ;
Plumb, VJ ;
Dailey, SM ;
Anderson, PG .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (15) :1517-1524
[5]   THE DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD - A COMPARISON OF ANESTHETICS AND MEASUREMENT METHODS [J].
GILL, RM ;
SWEENEY, RJ ;
REID, PR .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (04) :708-714
[6]  
Gold MR, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P3517
[7]   CORRELATION AMONG FIBRILLATION, DEFIBRILLATION, AND CARDIAC PACING [J].
IDEKER, RE ;
ZHOU, XH ;
KNISLEY, SB .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (03) :512-525
[8]   OPTIMAL TRUNCATION OF DEFIBRILLATION PULSES [J].
IRNICH, W .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (04) :673-688
[9]   A MINIMAL MODEL OF THE SINGLE CAPACITOR BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION WAVE-FORM [J].
KROLL, MW .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (11) :1782-1792
[10]   A MINIMAL MODEL OF THE MONOPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION PULSE [J].
KROLL, MW .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (04) :769-777