Introducing Sustainability in Value Models to Support Design Decision Making: A Systematic Review

被引:22
作者
Bertoni, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, SE-37179 Karlskrona, Sweden
关键词
sustainability; value modeling; decision support; value driven design; review; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; MAPPING SUS-VSM; BUSINESS MODEL; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; CUSTOMER VALUE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE-MEASURES;
D O I
10.3390/su9060994
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Manufacturing organizations shall recognize sustainability as a business occasion to capitalize on, rather than an undesirable pressing situation. Still, empirical evidence shows that this opportunity is hard to capture and communicate in global strategic decisions, through planning by tactical management, to daily operational activities. This paper systematically reviews the modeling challenges at the crossroad of value and sustainability decisions making, spotlighting methods and tools proposed in literature to link sustainability to customer value creation at strategic, tactical and operational level. While statistical results show that the topic of sustainability and value modeling is trending in literature, findings from content analysis reveal that recent attempts to promote a value-based view in the sustainability discussion remain at a strategic level, with most of the proposed indicators being suited for managerial decision-making. The lack of support at operational level points to the opportunity of cross-pollinating sustainability research with value-centered methodologies originating from the aerospace sector. The Value Driven Design framework is proposed as main hub from which to derive models supporting engineers and technology developers in the identification of win-win-win situations, where sustainable improvements are aligned with business advantages.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 226 条
[1]   Themes and challenges in making supply chains environmentally sustainable [J].
Abbasi, Maisam ;
Nilsson, Fredrik .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (05) :517-530
[2]   Business Models for Sustainability From a System Dynamics Perspective [J].
Abdelkafi, Nizar ;
Taeuscher, Karl .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 29 (01) :74-96
[3]  
Abidin N. Z., 2007, International Journal of Project Management, V25, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.10.005
[4]   Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review [J].
Adams, Richard ;
Jeanrenaud, Sally ;
Bessant, John ;
Denyer, David ;
Overy, Patrick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2016, 18 (02) :180-205
[5]   A TOPSIS extension framework for re-conceptualizing sustainability measurement [J].
Afful-Dadzie, Anthony ;
Afful-Dadzie, Eric ;
Turkson, Charles .
KYBERNETES, 2016, 45 (01) :70-86
[6]   Model of efficient and sustainable improvements in a lean production system through processes of environmental innovation [J].
Aguado, Sergio ;
Alvarez, Roberto ;
Domingo, Rosario .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 47 :141-148
[7]   Development of sustainable assessment criteria for building materials selection [J].
Akadiri, Peter ;
Olomolaiye, Paul .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 (06) :666-+
[8]   A Value Function for Assessing Sustainability: Application to Industrial Buildings [J].
Alarcon, Bibiana ;
Aguado, Antonio ;
Manga, Resmundo ;
Josa, Alejandro .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (01) :35-50
[9]   Fuzzy sustainability incentives in new product development An empirical exploration of sustainability challenges in manufacturing companies [J].
Alblas, A. A. ;
Peters, K. ;
Wortmann, J. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (04) :513-545
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INT J SUPPLY CHAIN M