Comprehensive Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Preventive Maintenance Techniques for Asphalt Pavement

被引:22
作者
Zheng, Mulian [1 ]
Chen, Wang [1 ]
Ding, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Zhang, Wenwu [2 ]
Yu, Sixin [2 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Key Lab Special Reg Highway Engn, Minist Educ, Midsouth Erhuan Rd, Xian 710064, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Hispeed Grp, Jinan 250098, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
life cycle assessment; asphalt pavement; preventive maintenance; sustainable; environmental impacts; sensitivity analysis; SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ROAD PAVEMENT; REHABILITATION; PERFORMANCE; INFRASTRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION; TECHNOLOGIES; EMISSIONS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/su13094887
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Preventive maintenance (PM) is regarded as the most economical maintenance strategy for asphalt pavement, but the life cycle environmental impacts (LCEI) of different PM techniques have not yet been comprehensively assessed and compared, thus hindering sustainable PM planning. This study aims to comprehensively estimate and compared the LCEI of five PM techniques then propose measures to reduce environmental impacts in PM design by using life cycle assessment (LCA), including fog seal with sand, micro-surfacing, composite seal, ultra-thin asphalt overlay, and thin asphalt overlay. Afterwards, ten kinds of LCEI categories and energy consumption of PM techniques were compared from the LCA phases, and inventory inputs perspectives, respectively. Results show that fog seal with sand and micro-surfacing can lower all LCEI scores by more than 50%. The environmental performance of five PM techniques provided by sensitivity analysis indicated that service life may not create significant impact on LCA results to some extent. Moreover, four PM combination plans were developed and compared for environmental performance, and results show that the PM plan only includes seal coat techniques that can reduce the total LCEI by 7-29% in pavement life. Increasing the frequency of seal coat techniques can make the PM plans more sustainable.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Comparative life cycle assessment of concrete road pavements using industrial by-products as alternative materials [J].
Anastasiou, E. K. ;
Liapis, A. ;
Papayianni, I. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 101 :1-8
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, US LIF CYCL INV DAT
[4]  
Bai R., 2019, HIGHWAY, V64, P252
[5]  
Bare J.C., EPA600R12554
[6]   Carbon footprint and embodied energy assessment of a civil works program in a residential estate of Western Australia [J].
Biswas, Wahidul K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (04) :732-744
[7]  
BRE, 2020, JLZJYGL0032020 BRE C
[8]   Decision Support in Selecting Airfield Pavement Design Alternatives Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study of Nashville Airport [J].
Butt, Ali Azhar ;
Harvey, John ;
Saboori, Arash ;
Ostovar, Maryam ;
Bejarano, Manuel ;
Garg, Navneet .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) :1-19
[9]   Comparative eco-efficiency analysis on asphalt pavement rehabilitation alternatives: Hot in-place recycling and milling-and-filling [J].
Cao, Ruijun ;
Leng, Zhen ;
Hsu, Shu-Chien .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 210 :1385-1395
[10]   Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Highway Construction Operations by Using a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment Approach: Case Study for Pavement Operations [J].
Cass, Darrell ;
Mukherjee, Amlan .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 137 (11) :1015-1025