Digital extraction: Blockchain traceability in mineral supply chains

被引:62
作者
Calvao, Filipe [1 ]
Archer, Matthew [2 ]
机构
[1] Grad Inst Int & Dev Studies, Anthropol & Sociol, Chemin Eugene Rigot 2A,Case Postale 1672, CH-1211 Geneva 1, Switzerland
[2] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Management Soc & Commun, Dalgas Have 15, DK-2000Z Frederiksberg, Denmark
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Blockchain; Traceability; Mining; Digital extraction; Certification; Digital technology; Political ecology; NATURAL-RESOURCES; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; MATERIAL WORLDS; MATERIALITY; GEOGRAPHIES; LABOR; DISPOSSESSION; UNCERTAINTY; AUTOMATION; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102381
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Digital data - including technologically-mediated data generated by blockchain-enabled traceability - is performing an increasingly integral role in extractive operations, but scarce attention has been paid to the structuring effect of these digital technologies or the socio-economic spatiality of data-driven mining operations. Drawing on extensive qualitative research (interviews, participant observation, and two sets of survey data among actors relevant to these mineral supply chains), this article advances the notion of "digital extraction" to describe the collection, analysis, and instrumentalization of digital data generated under the banner of blockchain-based due diligence, chain of custody certifications, and various transparency mechanisms, situated alongside and in support of mineral extraction. The article mobilizes concepts from political geography and political ecology to argue that digital technologies of traceability in extractive processes potentially create new forms of control and exclusion or exacerbate existing social, political, and territorial dispossession through asymmetric relations of power and knowledge in mineral supply chains. Despite industry efforts to make mineral supply chains more sustainable by resorting to digital certification and traceability, the strategic uses of uncertainty, ignorance, and ambiguity undergirding blockchain-enabled traceability systems fail to challenge existing inequalities in resource use and access or fulfill the promise of transparency and accountability.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[61]   This time it's different: lithium extraction, cultural politics and development in Bolivia [J].
Revette, Anna C. .
THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2017, 38 (01) :149-168
[62]   INTRODUCTION Resource Materialities [J].
Richardson, Tanya ;
Weszkalnys, Gisa .
ANTHROPOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2014, 87 (01) :5-30
[64]   Radical rentierism: gold mining, cryptocurrency and commodity collateralization in Venezuela [J].
Rosales, Antulio .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 26 (06) :1311-1332
[65]   When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction [J].
Sadowski, Jathan .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2019, 6 (01)
[66]   Inverting the impacts: Mining, conservation and sustainability claims near the Rio Tinto/QMM ilmenite mine in Southeast Madagascar [J].
Seagle, Caroline .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2012, 39 (02) :447-477
[67]   Enclave space: a new metageography of development? [J].
Sidaway, James D. .
AREA, 2007, 39 (03) :331-339
[68]   Resource desiring machines: The production of settler colonial space, violence, and the making of a resource in the Athabasca tar sands [J].
Simpson, Michael .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 74
[69]  
Smith Neil, 1984, Uneven development: nature, capital and the production of space
[70]   The precarious political economy of cobalt: Balancing prosperity, poverty, and brutality in artisanal and industrial mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo [J].
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 6 (03) :915-939