Evaluation of a laryngopharyngeal reflux management protocol

被引:34
作者
Gupta, Nikita [1 ]
Green, Ross W. [1 ]
Megwalu, Uchechukwu C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Long Isl Jewish Med Ctr, Queens Hosp Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Jamaica, NY 11432 USA
关键词
GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; FINDING SCORE; SYMPTOM INDEX; RELIABILITY; PATHWAYS; VALIDITY; DISEASE; RISK; ACID;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.01.008
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a protocol for management of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in a multi-provider clinic. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 188 patients treated for LPR. A standardized clinical protocol for diagnosis and management was instituted in 2012. Two cohorts were established: those managed according to the protocol, and those who were not. For patients managed with the LPR protocol, diagnosis was made using clinical judgment, guided by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Patients were treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with the goal of weaning therapy after symptom resolution. Response to therapy was rated using a global rating scale with three response levels: no response, partial response, and complete response. The primary outcome measure was complete response to therapy and the secondary outcome measures were any response (complete or partial) and successful wean off PPI therapy. Results: The patients treated with the LPR protocol had higher rates of complete response (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of any response (complete or partial) between the two groups (p = 0.08). Patients treated using the LPR protocol were more likely to be successfully weaned off PPI therapy (p = 0.006). Conclusions: The use of an LPR protocol improved treatment effectiveness in our clinic, highlighting the role of clinical protocols in reducing variability in care, thereby improving patient outcomes. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluation of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux: A practical approach [J].
Abou-Ismail A. ;
Vaezi M.F. .
Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2011, 13 (3) :213-218
[2]   Improving Health Outcomes and Value with Care Pathways: The Otolaryngologist's Role [J].
Altman, Kenneth W. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 151 (04) :527-529
[3]   Unexpected consequences of proton pump inhibitor use [J].
Altman, Kenneth W. ;
Radosevich, James A. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2009, 141 (05) :564-566
[4]   Changing impact of gastroesophageal reflux in medical and otolaryngology practice [J].
Altman, KW ;
Stephens, RM ;
Lyttle, CS ;
Weiss, KB .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (07) :1145-1153
[5]   The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS) [J].
Belafsky, PC ;
Postma, GN ;
Koufman, JA .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (08) :1313-1317
[6]   Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI) [J].
Belafsky, PC ;
Postma, GN ;
Koufman, JA .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2002, 16 (02) :274-277
[7]   Evidence of Extraesophageal Reflux in Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis [J].
Blumin, Joel H. ;
Johnston, Nikki .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2011, 121 (06) :1266-1273
[8]   Critical pathways - A review [J].
Every, NR ;
Hochman, J ;
Becker, R ;
Kopecky, S ;
Cannon, CP .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (04) :461-465
[9]   Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux [J].
Ford, CN .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (12) :1534-1540
[10]   Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in Otolaryngologic Practice [J].
Habermann, Walter ;
Schmid, Christoph ;
Neumann, Kurt ;
DeVaney, Trevor ;
Hammer, Heinz F. .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2012, 26 (03) :E123-E127