Arousal and emotional valence interact in written word recognition

被引:48
作者
Citron, Francesca M. M. [1 ,2 ]
Weekes, Brendan S. [1 ,3 ]
Ferstl, Evelyn C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Cluster Excellence Languages Emot, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Lab Commun Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Freiburg, Ctr Cognit Sci, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
word recognition; valence; arousal; emotion; lexical decision; gender; ATTENTION-GRABBING POWER; AUTOMATIC VIGILANCE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; NEGATIVE WORDS; RATINGS; CONCRETENESS; ACQUISITION; SLOW; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2014.897734
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Behavioural and neurophysiological studies reveal a prioritisation for emotional material during different cognitive tasks. Although emotion comprises two dimensions, i.e., valence and arousal, previous research has mostly focused on the former. This study aimed to investigate the effects of valence and arousal on lexical decision (LD) by manipulating both dimensions, while controlling correlated psycholinguistic variables (e.g., word length, frequency, imageability). Results showed that valence and arousal affect word recognition in an interactive way: LD latencies are slower for positive high-arousal and negative low-arousal words compared to positive low-arousal and negative high-arousal words, in line with an approach-withdrawal tendency model. Furthermore, principal component and regression analyses revealed a unique contribution of a cluster of emotion variables, independent of lexico-semantic variables, to explaining LD latencies. We conclude that emotional valence and arousal both need to be taken into account in studies of word processing as they show an interactive relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:1257 / 1267
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect [J].
Algom, D ;
Chajut, E ;
Lev, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (03) :323-338
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Tech. Rep. C-1
[3]   A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Isen, AM ;
Turken, U .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (03) :529-550
[4]   Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect [J].
Barrett, LF ;
Russell, JA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (04) :967-984
[5]   An investigation of sex differences in word ratings across concrete, abstract, and emotion words [J].
Bauer, Lisa M. ;
Altarriba, Jeanette .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2008, 58 (03) :465-474
[6]   P1 and beyond: Functional separation of multiple emotion effects in word recognition [J].
Bayer, Mareike ;
Sommer, Werner ;
Schacht, Annekathrin .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 (07) :959-969
[7]   Reading emotional words within sentences: The impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials [J].
Bayer, Mareike ;
Sommer, Werner ;
Schacht, Annekathrin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 78 (03) :299-307
[8]   Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words [J].
Bird, H ;
Franklin, S ;
Howard, D .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2001, 33 (01) :73-79
[9]   How are affective word ratings related to lexicosemantic properties? Evidence from the Sussex Affective Word List [J].
Citron, Francesca M. M. ;
Weekes, Brendan S. ;
Ferstl, Evelyn C. .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2014, 35 (02) :313-331
[10]   Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies [J].
Citron, Francesca M. M. .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 122 (03) :211-226