Intentions to make sustainable tourism choices: do value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs explain individual differences?

被引:58
作者
Doran, Rouven [1 ]
Hanss, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Larsen, Svein [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Psychosocial Sci, Christiesgate 12, N-5015 Bergen, Norway
[2] Hsch Darmstadt Univ Appl Sci, Dept Social & Cultural Sci & Social Work, Darmstadt, Germany
[3] Univ Stavanger, Norwegian Sch Hotel Management, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Sustainable tourism; values; consideration of future consequences; self-efficacy; collective efficacy; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN; FUTURE CONSEQUENCES; COGNITIVE THEORY; BEHAVIOR; GREEN; WILLINGNESS; ACTIVATION; IMMEDIATE; ATTITUDES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/15022250.2016.1179129
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is a growing literature addressing psychological variables that can be associated with choices of environmentally sustainable tourism alternatives. This paper contributes to this literature by focusing on individual differences in value orientations (i.e. egoistic values, altruistic values, and biospheric values), time perspective (i.e. consideration of immediate consequences and consideration of future consequences), and efficacy beliefs (i.e. self-efficacy and collective efficacy). A cross-sectional survey (N=385) was carried out to investigate the role of each of these psychological variables in explaining intentions to choose environmentally sustainable travel options. Overall results showed that value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs together contributed to explaining about 53% of the variance in behavioural intentions. Consideration of future consequences and collective efficacy showed the strongest associations with behavioural intentions. Implications of these findings for research and managerial practice are noted.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 238
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
anable Jillianlane., 2006, EVIDENCE BASE REV PU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Climate Change and Tourism
[3]   Time Perspective and Sustainable Behavior Evidence for the Distinction Between Consideration of Immediate and Future Consequences [J].
Arnocky, Steven ;
Milfont, Taciano L. ;
Nicol, Jeffrey R. .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2014, 46 (05) :556-582
[4]  
Bandura Albert, 1999, Self-efficacy, V13, P158, DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
[5]   'A holiday is a holiday': practicing sustainability, home and away [J].
Barr, Stewart ;
Shaw, Gareth ;
Coles, Tim ;
Prillwitz, Jan .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 18 (03) :474-481
[6]   Emerging green tourists in Australia: Their behaviours and attitudes [J].
Bergin-Seers, Suzanne ;
Mair, Judith .
TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY RESEARCH, 2009, 9 (02) :109-119
[7]  
Biel A, 2005, AMBIO, V34, P360, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2005)034[0360:HAVPB]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Consideration of Future Consequences as a Predictor of Environmentally Responsible Behavior: Evidence From a General Population Study [J].
Bruderer Enzler, Heidi .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 47 (06) :618-643
[10]   Self-efficacy or collective efficacy within the cognitive theory of stress model: Which more effectively explains people's self-reported proenvironmental behavior? [J].
Chen, Mei-Fang .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 42 :66-75