Abbreviated protocol for breast MRI: Are multiple sequences needed for cancer detection?

被引:150
作者
Mango, Victoria L. [1 ,2 ]
Morris, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Dershaw, D. David [2 ]
Abramson, Andrea [2 ]
Fry, Charles [2 ,3 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya S. [2 ]
Hughes, Mary [2 ]
Kaplan, Jennifer [2 ]
Jochelson, Maxine S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast & Imaging Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Breast MRI; Abbreviated MRI protocol; HIGH-RISK; PERSONAL HISTORY; SCREENING MRI; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the ability of an abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol, consisting of a precontrast T1 weighted (T1W) image and single early post-contrast T1W image, to detect breast carcinoma. Materials and methods: A HIPAA compliant Institutional Review Board approved review of 100 consecutive breast MRI examinations in patients with biopsy proven unicentric breast carcinoma. 79% were invasive carcinomas and 21% were ductal carcinoma in situ. Four experienced breast radiologists, blinded to carcinoma location, history and prior examinations, assessed the abbreviated protocol evaluating only the first post-contrast T1W image, post-processed subtracted first post-contrast and subtraction maximum intensity projection images. Detection and localization of tumor were compared to the standard full diagnostic examination consisting of 13 pre-contrast, post-contrast and post-processed sequences. Results: All 100 cancers were visualized on initial reading of the abbreviated protocol by at least one reader. The mean sensitivity for each sequence was 96% for the first post-contrast sequence, 96% for the first post-contrast subtraction sequence and 93% for the subtraction MIP sequence. Within each sequence, there was no significant difference between the sensitivities among the 4 readers (p = 0.471, p = 0.656, p = 0.139). Mean interpretation time was 44s (range 11-167 s). The abbreviated imaging protocol could be performed in approximately 10-15 min, compared to 30-40 min for the standard protocol. Conclusion: An abbreviated breast MRI protocol allows detection of breast carcinoma. One pre and postcontrast T1W sequence may be adequate for detecting breast carcinoma. These results support the possibility of refining breast MRI screening protocols. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 70
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] JOURNAL CLUB: Is Screening MRI Indicated for Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer? Analysis Based on Biopsy Results
    Arazi-Kleinman, Tal
    Skair-Levy, Miri
    Slonimsky, Einat
    Maly, Bella
    Uziely, Beatrice
    Libson, Eugene
    Sella, Tamar
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) : 919 - 927
  • [2] Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Zhang, Zheng
    Lehrer, Daniel
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Barr, Richard G.
    Boehm-Velez, Marcela
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Evans, W. Phil, III
    Larsen, Linda H.
    Morton, Marilyn J.
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    Farria, Dione M.
    Cormack, Jean B.
    Marques, Helga S.
    Adams, Amanda
    Yeh, Nolin M.
    Gabrielli, Glenna
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13): : 1394 - 1404
  • [3] Breast MRI Screening of Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer
    Brennan, Sandra
    Liberman, Laura
    Dershaw, D. David
    Morris, Elizabeth
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) : 510 - 516
  • [4] Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results
    Kuhl, CK
    Schmutzler, RK
    Leutner, CC
    Kempe, A
    Wardelmann, E
    Hocke, A
    Maringa, M
    Pfeifer, U
    Krebs, D
    Schild, HH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (01) : 267 - 279
  • [5] Kuhl CK, 2011, RSNA
  • [6] Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: Prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Ascher, Susan M.
    Weatherall, Paul T.
    Bluemke, David A.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Marcom, P. Kelly
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Tomlinson, Gail
    Skates, Steven J.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (02) : 381 - 388
  • [7] Accuracy and Interpretation Time of Computer-Aided Detection Among Novice and Experienced Breast MRI Readers
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Blume, Jeffrey D.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Hylton, Nola M.
    Herman, Benjamin
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (06) : W683 - W689
  • [8] MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population
    Morris, EA
    Liberman, L
    Ballon, DJ
    Robson, M
    Abramson, AF
    Heerdt, A
    Dershaw, DD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (03) : 619 - 626
  • [9] MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer
    Orel, SG
    Schnall, MD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) : 13 - 30
  • [10] Podo F, 2002, J EXP CLIN CANC RES, V21, P115