Student and teaching characteristics related to ratings of instruction in medical sciences graduate programs

被引:10
作者
Donnon, Tyrone [1 ]
Delver, Hilary [2 ]
Beran, Tanya
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Med Educ & Res Unit, Dept Community Hlth Sci,Hlth Sci Ctr G705, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Off Fac Dev, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
关键词
GRADING LENIENCY; VALIDITY; WORKLOAD; BIAS;
D O I
10.3109/01421590903480097
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine student ratings obtained from the Universal Student Ratings of Instruction (USRI) instrument. These responses were compared to various student characteristics. Also, teaching characteristics that were most closely associated with the ratings were determined. Method: A total of 1738 USRI forms were completed by graduate students enrolled in medical science courses from 1999 to 2006 in the Faculty of Medicine at a Canadian university. Results: Between group comparisons showed that negative student perceptions about the course (i.e., did not have the freedom to select), perceiving the course workload as high, and low grade expectations held were related to negative student ratings of overall quality of instruction. In terms of the student and teaching characteristics, organization of course material and perceptions of whether students felt they learned a lot in the course were most closely related to global ratings of instructional quality. Conclusion: Implications for teaching focus on improving the organization and delivery of course content that meets the learning objectives of graduate students in medical sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 332
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DEV COMPREHENSIVE FA
[2]  
Beran T., 2005, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, V30, P593, DOI [10.1080/02602930500260688, DOI 10.1080/02602930500260688]
[3]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[4]  
COHEN PA, 1981, REV EDUC RES, V51, P281, DOI 10.3102/00346543051003281
[5]   Navigating student ratings of instruction [J].
dApollonia, S ;
Abrami, PC .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (11) :1198-1208
[6]   A SELECTIVE REVIEW OF THE VALIDITY OF STUDENT-RATINGS OF TEACHING [J].
DOWELL, DA ;
NEAL, JA .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1982, 53 (01) :51-62
[7]   No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction [J].
Greenwald, AG ;
Gillmore, GM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) :743-751
[8]   Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction [J].
Greenwald, AG .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (11) :1182-1186
[9]  
Greenwald AG, 2002, ROLE OF CONSTRUCTS IN PYSCHOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, P277
[10]  
Kulik J., 2001, NEW DIRECTIONS I RES, V109, P9