The utility of image-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of spontaneous vertebral osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:40
|
作者
Pupaibool, Jakrapun [1 ]
Vasoo, Shawn [2 ]
Erwin, Patricia J. [3 ]
Murad, Mohammad Hassan [4 ]
Berbari, Elie F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Div Clin Microbiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Mayo Clin Lib, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Prevent & Occupat Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Vertebral osteomyelitis; Vertebral spondylodiscitis; Spine infection; Vertebral infection; Biopsy; Aspiration; SPINE; SPONDYLITIS; MANAGEMENT; DISCITIS; CURVE; YIELD; BONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2014.07.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spontaneous vertebral osteomyelitis (SVOM) is mostly acquired via hematogenous seeding. Diagnosis of SVOM is often delayed because of the insidious nature and rarity of this disease. The microbiological yield of image-guided needle biopsy varies between 36% and 91%. The utility and accuracy of this procedure have not been systematically reviewed. PURPOSE: To systematically review and assess the diagnostic accuracy of image-guided spinal biopsy for SVOM in adults when compared with combined reference standards. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAMPLE: Seven retrospective studies involving 482 patients with clinical and/or radiologic suspicion of SVOM who underwent image-guided spinal biopsy were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Other outcomes included likelihood ratio of a positive test (LRP), likelihood ratio of a negative test (LRN), sensitivity, and specificity. METHODS: We searched in six medical databases through September 1, 2013 for studies evaluating the performance of image-guided spinal biopsy for SVOM with no limits on language or publication date. Combined reference standards, which included histopathologic findings consistent with vertebral osteomyelitis, identifications of pathogens from open surgery and/or blood cultures, and/or evidence of clinical and radiologic improvement after empiric antimicrobial therapy, were used for comparison. The random-effect model was used for meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently selected the studies. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-eight potentially relevant studies were identified. Seven studies were included in our analysis. Two studies that used only single reference standard were excluded in the sensitivity analysis, and five studies involving 352 patients were pooled. Image-guided spinal biopsy had a DOR of 45.50 (95% confidence interval [ CI], 13.66-151.56), an LRP of 16.76 (95% CI, 5.51-50.95), an LRN of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.24-0.64), a sensitivity of 52.2% (95% CI, 45.8-58.5), and a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 94.5-100). This is based on the assumption that combined reference standards are a valid standard for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided spinal biopsy is highly specific and performs well in predicting SVOM, but has a moderate accuracy for ruling out this diagnosis. This procedure should beconsidered in the diagnostic work-up of adults suspected with SVOM. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 131
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percutaneous aspiration versus tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aguinagalde, Borja
    Zabaleta, Jon
    Fuentes, Marta
    Bazterargui, Nerea
    Hernandez, Carlos
    Miguel Izquierdo, Jose
    Ignacio Pijuan, Jose
    Ignacio Emparanza, Jose
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 37 (05) : 1129 - 1135
  • [22] Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Thyroid Cancer With Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Core-Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lan, Ling
    Luo, Yong
    Zhou, Meicen
    Huo, Lili
    Chen, Hailing
    Zuo, Qingyao
    Deng, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [23] Diagnostic outcome and safety of CT-guided core needle biopsy for mediastinal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Han Na
    Yun, Seong Jong
    Kim, Jung Im
    Ryu, Chang-Woo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 588 - 599
  • [24] Detection and management of bleeding in the setting of image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy
    Benjamin S. Strnad
    Malak Itani
    William D. Middleton
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2681 - 2696
  • [25] Role of Image-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy in the Age of Precision Medicine
    Miyuki Sone
    Shunsuke Sugawara
    Yasushi Yatabe
    Current Oncology Reports, 2022, 24 : 1035 - 1044
  • [26] The diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in pulmonary lesions: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, H. -F.
    Zeng, X. -T.
    Xing, F.
    Fan, N.
    Liao, M. -Y.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (01) : E1 - E10
  • [27] Diagnostic accuracy of palpation versus ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosis of malignancy in thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tarigan, Tri Juli Edi
    Anwar, Budiman Syaeful
    Sinto, Robert
    Wisnu, Wismandari
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [28] Detection and management of bleeding in the setting of image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy
    Strnad, Benjamin S.
    Itani, Malak
    Middleton, William D.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (08) : 2681 - 2696
  • [29] Role of Image-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy in the Age of Precision Medicine
    Sone, Miyuki
    Sugawara, Shunsuke
    Yatabe, Yasushi
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 24 (08) : 1035 - 1044
  • [30] Efficacy of EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Saghir, Syed Mohsin
    Dhindsa, Banreet Singh
    Daid, Sarav Gunjith Singh
    Mashiana, Harmeet S.
    Dhaliwal, Amaninder
    Cross, Chad
    Singh, Shailender
    Bhat, Ishfaq
    Ohning, Gordon, V
    Adler, Douglas G.
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2022, 11 (04) : 275 - 282