Device Life of Two Generations of Provox Voice Prostheses

被引：7
作者：
Thylur, David S. [1 ]
Villegas, Brenda Capobres [1 ]
Fisher, Laurel M. [1 ]
Sinha, Uttam K. [1 ]
Kokot, Niels [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Tina & Rick Caruso Dept Otolaryngol Head & Ne, 1540 Alcazar St,Suite 204M, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
来源：
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY | 2016年 / 125卷 / 06期
关键词：
tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis; alaryngeal speech; device life; laryngectomy; Provox; 2; Provox Vega; TOTAL LARYNGECTOMY; SILICONE-RUBBER; POSTLARYNGECTOMY PATIENTS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; VOCAL REHABILITATION; BIOFILM FORMATION; DAIRY-PRODUCTS; IN-VITRO; RADIOTHERAPY; RESTORATION;
D O I：
10.1177/0003489415624701
中图分类号：
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号：
100213 ;
摘要：
Background: Tracheoesophageal voice prostheses are invaluable for speech rehabilitation in patients who have received total laryngectomy, but device failure impedes communication and creates psychosocial and financial burdens. This study compares the Provox 2 and Provox Vega voice prostheses on the parameter of device life. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of 21 patients with 181 device replacements at an academic tertiary care medical center. Disparity in device life and factors that may influence device life were analyzed. Results: The mean device life for Provox 2, at 115.6 days (SE = 5.8), was longer than for Provox Vega, at 65.1 days (SE = 7.5) (P < .001). Conclusions: Device longevity was greater for Provox 2 over Provox Vega. These results will facilitate the design of prospective studies to assess reasons for variations in device life between patients and device types.
引用
收藏
页码：501 / 507
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Device Life of the Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Revisited [J].
Lewin, Jan S. ;
Baumgart, Leah M. ;
Barrow, Martha P. ;
Hutcheson, Katherine A. .
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2017, 143 (01) :65-71
[32]   A prospective, randomized comparative study of patient perceptions and preferences of two types of indwelling voice prostheses [J].
Hancock, Kelli ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Lawson, Nadine ;
van As-Brooks, Corina J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2012, 47 (03) :300-309
[33]   Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy.: Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis. [J].
Schäfer, P ;
Klützke, N ;
Schwerdtfeger, FP .
LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2001, 80 (11) :677-681
[34]   Degradation of Silicone Rubber Causes Provox 2 Voice Prosthesis Malfunctioning [J].
Fusconi, Massimo ;
Taddei, Anna Rita ;
Gallo, Andrea ;
Conte, Michela ;
De Virgilio, Armando ;
Greco, Antonio ;
Lo Vasco, Vincenza Rita ;
Macri, Gian Franco ;
Roma, Rocco ;
Volpini, Fabrizio ;
Benincasa, Anna Teresa ;
De Vincentiis, Marco .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2014, 28 (02) :250-254
[35]   Dislocation of voice prostheses - Interdisciplinary management of diagnostic and treatment [J].
Birk, S. ;
Michaeli, P. ;
Kapsreiter, M. ;
Alexiou, C. .
HNO, 2009, 57 (11) :1126-+
[36]   Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Provox® voice prosthesis in South Africa [J].
Cornu, AS ;
Vlantis, AC ;
Elliot, H ;
Gregor, RT .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2003, 117 (01) :56-59
[37]   Time Course of Microbial Colonization of Different Voice Prostheses [J].
Schuldt, T. ;
Dommerich, S. ;
Pau, H-W. ;
Kramp, B. .
LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2010, 89 (10) :606-611
[38]   Solving problems after rehabilitation with voice prostheses. Two rare cases of fistula-related complications [J].
Lorenz, K. J. ;
Nolte, S. .
HNO, 2016, 64 (07) :508-514
[39]   Quality of life for patients after laryngectomy and surgical voice rehabilitation.: Experience with the Provox prosthesis [J].
Tisch, M ;
Lorenz, KJ ;
Störrle, E ;
Maier, H .
HNO, 2003, 51 (06) :467-472
[40]   Clinical phase I/feasibility study of the next generation indwelling Provox voice prosthesis (Provox Vega) [J].
Hilgers, Frans J. M. ;
Ackerstaff, Annemieke H. ;
van Rossum, Maya ;
Jacobi, Irene ;
Balm, Alfons J. M. ;
Tan, I. Bing ;
van den Brekel, Michiel W. M. .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2010, 130 (04) :511-519
12345