On the Use of Interaction Entropy and Related Methods to Estimate Binding Entropies

被引:36
作者
Ekberg, Vilhelm [1 ]
Ryde, Ulf [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Chem Ctr, Dept Theoret Chem, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
FREE-ENERGY CALCULATIONS; LIGAND-BINDING; MOLECULAR SIMULATION; PROTEIN; DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; ACCURACY; MODEL; BIAS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00374
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Molecular mechanics combined with Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born and solvent-accessible area solvation energies (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) are popular methods to estimate the free energy for the binding of small molecules to biomacromolecules. However, the estimation of the entropy has been problematic and time-consuming. Traditionally, normal-mode analysis has been used to estimate the entropy, but more recently, alternative approaches have been suggested. In particular, it has been suggested that exponential averaging of the electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interaction energies may provide much faster and more accurate entropies, the interaction entropy (IE) approach. In this study, we show that this exponential averaging is extremely poorly conditioned. Using stochastic simulations, assuming that the interaction energies follow a Gaussian distribution, we show that if the standard deviation of the interaction energies (sIE) is larger than 15 kJ/mol, it becomes practically impossible to converge the interaction entropies (more than 10 million energies are needed, and the number increases exponentially). A cumulant approximation to the second order of the exponential average shows a better convergence, but for sIE > 25 kJ/mol, it gives entropies that are unrealistically large. Moreover, in practical applications, both methods show a steady increase in the entropy with the number of energies considered.
引用
收藏
页码:5379 / 5391
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, AMBE 2018
[2]   Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations [J].
Åqvist, J ;
Luzhkov, VB ;
Brandsdal, BO .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 35 (06) :358-365
[3]   A WELL-BEHAVED ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL BASED METHOD USING CHARGE RESTRAINTS FOR DERIVING ATOMIC CHARGES - THE RESP MODEL [J].
BAYLY, CI ;
CIEPLAK, P ;
CORNELL, WD ;
KOLLMAN, PA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 97 (40) :10269-10280
[4]   MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS WITH COUPLING TO AN EXTERNAL BATH [J].
BERENDSEN, HJC ;
POSTMA, JPM ;
VANGUNSTEREN, WF ;
DINOLA, A ;
HAAK, JR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 81 (08) :3684-3690
[5]   Convergence of single-step free energy perturbation [J].
Boresch, Stefan ;
Woodcock, H. Lee .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 2017, 115 (9-12) :1200-1213
[6]   A NOTE ON THE GENERATION OF RANDOM NORMAL DEVIATES [J].
BOX, GEP ;
MULLER, ME .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1958, 29 (02) :610-611
[7]   Accuracy Assessment and Automation of Free Energy Calculations for Drug Design [J].
Christ, Clara D. ;
Fox, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2014, 54 (01) :108-120
[8]   PARTICLE MESH EWALD - AN N.LOG(N) METHOD FOR EWALD SUMS IN LARGE SYSTEMS [J].
DARDEN, T ;
YORK, D ;
PEDERSEN, L .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 98 (12) :10089-10092
[9]   Interaction Entropy: A New Paradigm for Highly Efficient and Reliable Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy [J].
Duan, Lili ;
Liu, Xiao ;
Zhang, John Z. H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 138 (17) :5722-5728
[10]   The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities [J].
Genheden, Samuel ;
Ryde, Ulf .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2015, 10 (05) :449-461