Studying the Joint Effects of Population Stratification and Sampling in Case-Control Association Studies

被引:2
作者
Cheng, K. F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, J. Y. [3 ]
Chen, J. H. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Ctr Biostat, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cent Univ, Grad Inst Stat, Chungli 32054, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ, Grad Inst Biostat, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Association; Case-control study; Population stratification; Sampling scheme; Type I error; GENOMIC CONTROL; STRUCTURED POPULATIONS; GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY; POLYMORPHISMS; TRAITS; FUTURE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1159/000297658
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Population stratification (PS) is referred to the systematic difference in allele frequencies between subpopulations in a population. It could cause a false-positive conclusion in a case-control association study, where the association is due to the structure of the underlying population, not a disease-associated locus. In this paper, we study the joint effects of PS and data sampling when the genetic effect is null. The level of the PS effect depends on the variation of the baseline genotype frequency across subpopulations and matching effectiveness of the sampling. In the case of simple random sampling (SRS), the matching effectiveness equals the inverse of the variation of the disease odds, and thus the PS bias is null under constant disease risk. However, if the latter condition holds but the sampling is not SRS, the bias may still exist. The magnitude of the bias increases as the deviation between the true sampling and SRS increases. We also derive bounds for the bias. If the bounds are approximately known or estimable, we show that this information can be used to compute a conservative p value for the usual association test. We give two real examples to demonstrate the application of the new method. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 261
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Genetic polymorphisms and disease [J].
Altshuler, D ;
Kruglyak, L ;
Lander, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (22) :1626-1626
[2]  
ARDLIE KG, 2002, AM J HUM GENET, V71, P1478
[3]   The power of genomic control [J].
Bacanu, SA ;
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 66 (06) :1933-1944
[4]   Association studies for quantitative traits in structured populations [J].
Bacanu, SA ;
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 22 (01) :78-93
[5]   Genetic signatures of strong recent positive selection at the lactase gene [J].
Bersaglieri, T ;
Sabeti, PC ;
Patterson, N ;
Vanderploeg, T ;
Schaffner, SF ;
Drake, JA ;
Rhodes, M ;
Reich, DE ;
Hirschhorn, JN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2004, 74 (06) :1111-1120
[6]   Demonstrating stratification in a European American population [J].
Campbell, CD ;
Ogburn, EL ;
Lunetta, KL ;
Lyon, HN ;
Freedman, ML ;
Groop, LC ;
Altshuler, D ;
Ardlie, KG ;
Hirschhorn, JN .
NATURE GENETICS, 2005, 37 (08) :868-872
[7]  
CHAKRABORTY R, 1993, SCIENCE, V260, P5111
[8]   Simultaneously correcting for population stratification and for genotyping error in case-control association studies [J].
Cheng, K. F. ;
Lin, W. J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 81 (04) :726-743
[9]   Genomic control for association studies [J].
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (04) :997-1004
[10]   Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies [J].
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K ;
Wasserman, L .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 60 (03) :155-166