Experimental Heat Loads for Electrothermal Anti-Icing and De-Icing on UAVs

被引:50
作者
Hann, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Enache, Adriana [3 ,4 ]
Nielsen, Mikkel Cornelius [2 ]
Stovner, Bard Nagy [2 ]
van Beeck, Jeroen [4 ]
Johansen, Tor Arne [1 ]
Borup, Kasper Trolle [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Engn Cybernet, Ctr Autonomous Marine Operat & Syst, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] UBIQ Aerosp, N-7011 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Fac Appl Sci, Aerothermomech Dept, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Von Karman Inst Fluid Dynam, Environm & Appl Fluid Dynam Dept, B-1650 Rhode St Genese, Belgium
关键词
ice protection system; UAV; unmanned aerial vehicle; UAS; unmanned aerial system; atmospheric icing; in-flight icing; icing; anti-icing; de-icing; drone; RPAS; adverse weather;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace8030083
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Atmospheric in-flight icing on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is a significant hazard. UAVs that are not equipped with ice protection systems are usually limited to operations within visual line of sight or to weather conditions without icing risk. As many military and commercial UAV missions require flights beyond visual line of sight and into adverse weather conditions, energy-efficient ice protection systems are required. In this experimental study, two electro-thermal ice protection systems for fixed-wing UAVs were tested. One system was operated in anti-icing and de-icing mode, and the other system was designed as a parting strip de-icing system. Experiments were conducted in an icing wind tunnel facility for varying icing conditions at low Reynolds numbers. A parametric study over the ice shedding time was used to identify the most energy-efficient operation mode. The results showed that longer intercycle durations led to higher efficiencies and that de-icing with a parting strip was superior compared to anti-icing and de-icing without a parting strip. These findings are relevant for the development of energy-efficient systems in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, tive Multimedia Artif. Intell.
[2]  
Bennani L., 2014, 2 DIMENSIONAL MODELL
[3]   Iced-airfoil aerodynamics [J].
Bragg, MB ;
Broeren, AP ;
Blumenthal, LA .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2005, 41 (05) :323-362
[4]   Effect of intercycle ice accretions on airfoil performance [J].
Broeren, AP ;
Bragg, MB ;
Addy, HE .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2004, 41 (01) :165-174
[5]   Aircraft icing: An ongoing threat to aviation safety [J].
Cao, Yihua ;
Tan, Wenyuan ;
Wu, Zhenlong .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 75 :353-385
[6]   Characterization of Aircraft Icing Environments with Supercooled Large Drops for Application to Commercial Aircraft Certification [J].
Cober, Stewart G. ;
Isaac, George A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (02) :265-284
[7]  
Enache A., 2020, P ATMOS SP ENVI C AI
[8]  
FAA, 2015, CIRCULAR AC 91 74B
[9]   Aircraft icing [J].
Gent, RW ;
Dart, NP ;
Cansdale, JT .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2000, 358 (1776) :2873-2911
[10]  
Hann R., 2020, UNSETTLED TOPICS UAV