Compliance with National Institute of Health and Care Excellence risk-based screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in nulliparous women

被引:16
作者
Murphy, Nicolai M. [1 ]
McCarthy, Fergus P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Khashan, Ali S. [2 ,5 ]
Myers, Jenny E. [6 ]
Simpson, Nigel A. B. [7 ]
Kearney, Patricia M. [5 ]
Greene, Richard A. [8 ]
Poston, Lucilla [3 ,4 ]
Kenny, Louise C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cork Univ Matern Hosp, Univ Coll Cork, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Irish Ctr Fetal & Neonatal Translat Res INFANT, Cork, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Irish Ctr Fetal & Neonatal Translat Res INFANT, Cork, Ireland
[3] Kings Coll London, Womens Hlth Acad Ctr, Div Womens Hlth, London WC2R 2LS, England
[4] Kings Hlth Partners, London, England
[5] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Cork, Ireland
[6] Univ Manchester, St Marys Hosp, Maternal & Fetal Hlth Res Ctr, Manchester M13 0JH, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Leeds, Div Womens & Childrens Hlth, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Cork Univ Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Ctr, 5th Floor, Cork, Ireland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Gestational diabetes; Risk factor; Screening; Compliance; Pregnancy; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.044
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate compliance with risk-based screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) in a nulliparous cohort. Design: A retrospective analysis of nulliparous women recruited to a prospective cohort, the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) study, was performed. Population included 2428 healthy nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies, recruited within Cork, Ireland: and Manchester, Leeds and London, United Kingdom. Compliance with risk factor screening for GDM was assessed in relation to the following risk factors: obesity, family history of diabetes and increased ethnic risk. GDM was diagnosed using an oral Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT) with locally employed diagnostic criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS V22). Descriptive statistics are presented for the various baseline characteristics using numbers and percentages. Cross tabulation was used to compare relevant groups. When comparing group distributions Chi-square test was used. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In the entire cohort of 2432 women, 27% (650 Women) had one or more identifiable risk factors as defined by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for GDM. Of those that had identifiable GDM risk factors according to the NICE guidelines, 395(60.8%) were appropriately screened. 253 (38.9%) had risk factors but were not screened. 261 (14.6%) had no GDM NICE risk factors but were screened with an oral GTT. Women with a risk factor that were screened with a GTT had an 8.9% (n = 34) prevalence of GDM. Of those that were screened but did not have a risk factor 7.7% (n = 20) were diagnosed with GDM. Overall, 2% (54 women) of the cohort had a diagnosis of GDM. Ethnicity was the risk factor most likely to be missed (n = 55, 66.3%). The GTT test was completed within the recommended gestational window (24-28 weeks) 56.6% (n = 371) of the time. Conclusion: This study highlights poor compliance with risk factor screening for GDM in nulliparous women. Further investigation into the underlying reasons is warranted as well as the implications for pregnancy outcome. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 65
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics, 2001, Obstet Gynecol, V98, P525
  • [2] [Anonymous], DEF DIAGN CLASS RE 1
  • [3] Applying Current Screening Tools for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus to a European Population: Is It Time for Change?
    Avalos, Gloria E.
    Owens, Lisa A.
    Dunne, Fidelma
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (10) : 3040 - 3044
  • [4] Comment on: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2011 (vol 34, pg e53, 2011)
    Basevi, V
    Di Mario, S.
    Morciano, C.
    Nonino, F.
    Magrini, N.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (08) : 1887 - 1887
  • [5] Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bellamy, Leanne
    Casas, Juan-Pablo
    Hingorani, Aroon D.
    Williams, David
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 373 (9677) : 1773 - 1779
  • [6] GESTATIONAL DIABETES: OVERVIEW OF THE NEW CONSENSUS SCREENING STRATEGY AND DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
    Benhalima, K.
    Van Crombrugge, P.
    Hanssens, M.
    Devlieger, R.
    Verhaeghe, J.
    Mathieu, C.
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2012, 67 (04) : 255 - 261
  • [7] Bloomgarden ZT, 2010, DIABETES CARE, V33, pE60, DOI [10.2337/dc10-zb09, 10.2337/dc10-zb05, 10.2337/dc10-zb02, 10.2337/dc10-zb03, 10.2337/dc10-zb08, 10.2337/dc10-zb01, 10.2337/dc10-zb07]
  • [8] Universal rather than selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus may improve fetal outcomes
    Cosson, E
    Benchimol, M
    Carbillon, L
    Pharisien, I
    Pariès, J
    Valensi, P
    Lormeau, B
    Bolie, S
    Uzan, M
    Attali, JR
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2006, 32 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [9] The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus
    Coustan, Donald R.
    Lowe, Lynn P.
    Metzger, Boyd E.
    Dyer, Alan R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (06) : 654.e1 - 654.e6
  • [10] Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes
    Crowther, CA
    Hiller, JE
    Moss, JR
    McPhee, AJ
    Jeffries, WS
    Robinson, JS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (24) : 2477 - 2486