Measurements of skin-friction of systematically generated surface roughness

被引:49
作者
Barros, Julio M. [1 ]
Schultz, Michael P. [2 ]
Flack, Karen A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Okinawa Inst Sci & Technol, Fluid Mech Unit, 1919-1 Tancha, Okinawa 9040945, Japan
[2] US Naval Acad, Dept Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
[3] US Naval Acad, Dept Mech Engn, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
关键词
Random roughness; Friction factor; Rough-wall turbulent flow; Channel flow; TURBULENT; ELEMENTS; MODEL; LAYER; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.04.015
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The flow conditions at which a given surface will begin to show the effects of roughness in the form of increased wall shear stress above that of the hydraulically-smooth wall and the behavior of frictional drag in the transitionally-rough regime are still poorly understood. From a practical standpoint, the engineering correlations to predict this behavior should be based on information that can be obtained solely from the surface topography, thus excluding any information that requires hydrodynamic testing. The goal of this work is to take a systematic approach when generating surface roughness where the roughness parameters can be controlled. Three surfaces with fixed amplitude and varying power-law spectral slope (E(kappa) similar to kappa(p); P = -0.5, -1.0, -1.5) were generated and replicated using high-resolution 3D printing. Results show that the surface with the shallower spectral slope, P = -0.5, produces the highest drag, whereas the surface with the steeper spectral slope, P = -1.5 produces the least drag. This highlights that some roughness scales do not contribute significantly to the drag. In fact, the effective slopes, ES of the investigated surfaces were less than 0.35, which indicates that the surfaces are in the so-called "wavy" regime (Schultz and Flack, 2009). A high-pass filter of 1 mm (corresponding to similar to 10 times of the roughness height) was applied. By removing the long-wavelength roughness scales, the correlation between the filtered roughness amplitude and the frictional drag showed the correct trend.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Dynamic roughness model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over multiscale, fractal-like rough surfaces [J].
Anderson, W. ;
Meneveau, C. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2011, 679 :288-314
[2]   Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness [J].
Anderson, William ;
Barros, Julio M. ;
Christensen, Kenneth T. ;
Awasthi, Ankit .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2015, 768 :316-347
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1944, T AM SOC MECH ENG AM
[4]   Observations of turbulent secondary flows in a rough-wall boundary layer [J].
Barros, Julio M. ;
Christensen, Kenneth T. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2014, 748 :R1-R13
[5]   Image inpainting [J].
Bertalmio, M ;
Sapiro, G ;
Caselles, V ;
Ballester, C .
SIGGRAPH 2000 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, :417-424
[6]  
Bettermann D, 1965, TECHNICAL REPORT
[7]   A systematic investigation of roughness height and wavelength in turbulent pipe flow in the transitionally rough regime [J].
Chan, L. ;
MacDonald, M. ;
Chung, D. ;
Hutchins, N. ;
Ooi, A. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2015, 771 :743-777
[8]  
Colebrook C.F., 1939, Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, V12, P393, DOI [10.1680/ijoti.1939.14509, DOI 10.1680/IJOTI.1939.14509]
[9]   ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF EXPERIMENTAL UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS [J].
COLEMAN, HW ;
STEELE, WG .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (10) :1888-1896
[10]  
Dirling RJR., 1973, 8 THERM C, P763