Addressing Tobacco Use in Underserved Communities Through a Peer-Facilitated Smoking Cessation Program

被引:6
作者
Apata, Jummai [1 ]
Sheikhattari, Payam [1 ,2 ]
Bleich, Lisa [3 ]
Kamangar, Farin [1 ,4 ]
O'Keefe, Anne Marie [2 ]
Wagner, Fernando A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Morgan State Univ, ASCEND Ctr Biomed Res, 1700 E Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251 USA
[2] Morgan State Univ, Sch Community Hlth & Policy, 1700 E Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251 USA
[3] ACTS, 4701 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Morgan State Univ, Sch Comp Math & Nat Sci, 1700 E Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251 USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Sch Social Work, 525 West Redwood St, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Smoking cessation; CBPR; Peer-based approach; Underserved population; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; UNITED-STATES; INTERVENTION; QUIT; DETERMINANTS; INCENTIVES; PREDICTORS; ABSTINENCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s10900-019-00635-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Communities Engaged and Advocating for a Smoke-Free Environment (CEASE) is a long-standing research partnership between a university and the neighboring community that was established to reduce tobacco use among poor and underserved residents. The CEASE tobacco cessation program was implemented in four phases, with each new phase applying lessons learned from the previous phases to improve outcomes. This study describes CEASE's community-based approach and reports results from implementing the second phase of the intervention which, among other things, varied in the type of incentives, setting, and providers used. CEASE implemented a mixed-methods study following the Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach. During Phase II, a total of 398 smokers were recruited into two 12-session group counseling interventions facilitated by trained peers in community venues, which differed in the type of incentives used to increase participation and reward the achievement of milestones. At 12-week follow-up, 21% of all participants reported not smoking, with a retention rate (i.e., attendance at six or more of the 12 cessation classes offered) of 51.9%. No significant differences in cessation outcomes were found between the two study arms. Using a CBPR approach resulted in a peer-led model of care with improved outcomes compared to Phase I, which was provided by clinicians. The combined use of monetary and non-monetary incentives was helpful in increasing participation in the program but did not significantly impact smoking cessation. A CBPR approach can increase the acceptability and effectiveness of cessation services for underserved populations.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 931
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society [ACS], 2009, FRESHST GROUP BAS TO
[2]  
Andrews JO, 2007, ETHNIC DIS, V17, P331
[3]   Application of a CBPR Framework to Inform a Multi-level Tobacco Cessation Intervention in Public Housing Neighborhoods [J].
Andrews, Jeannette O. ;
Tingen, Martha S. ;
Jarriel, Stacey Crawford ;
Caleb, Maudesta ;
Simmons, Alisha ;
Brunson, Juanita ;
Mueller, Martina ;
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S. ;
Newman, Susan D. ;
Cox, Melissa J. ;
Magwood, Gayenell ;
Hurman, Christina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 50 (1-2) :129-140
[4]   Community-Based Participatory Research and Smoking Cessation Interventions: A Review of the Evidence [J].
Andrews, Jeannette O. ;
Newman, Susan D. ;
Heath, Janie ;
Williams, Lovoria B. ;
Tingen, Martha S. .
NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 47 (01) :81-+
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Am J Public Health, V85, P183
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, EPIDATA SOFTW
[7]  
Apata J., 2018, EXAMINING FACTORS RE
[8]   Drop-out from addiction treatment: A systematic review of risk factors [J].
Brorson, Hanne H. ;
Arnevik, Espen Ajo ;
Rand-Hendriksen, Kim ;
Duckert, Fanny .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 33 (08) :1010-1024
[9]   Incentives for smoking cessation [J].
Cahill, Kate ;
Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie ;
Perera, Rafael .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (05)
[10]  
CDC National Center for Health Statistics [NCHS], 2017, NAT HLTH INT SURV NH