Simultaneous adoption of integrated soil fertility management technologies in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa

被引:6
作者
Mponela, Powell [1 ]
Kassie, Girma T. [2 ]
Tamene, Lulseged D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Freidrich Wilhelms Univ Bonn, Ctr Dev Res ZEF, Bonn, Germany
[2] Int Ctr Agr Res Dry Areas, ILRI Campus, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] CIAT, IRLI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Integrated soil fertility management; simultaneous adoption; resource scarcity; learning; risk aversion; Chinyanja Triangle; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; YIELD GAPS; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; PRICE VOLATILITY; MAIZE; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTIONS; CHALLENGES; NUTRIENT;
D O I
10.1111/1477-8947.12155
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Empirical scientific evidence indicates that there is still room for increasing food production by improving land productivity. This study aimed at identifying the key determinants that govern farmers' decisions to adopt multiple components of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) in a maize mixed cropping system of the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa. Revealed preferences of ISFM components were collected from 320 randomly selected households and multivariate probit (MVP) model was used to analyse the simultaneous effects on adoption based on biophysical plot and household-level socioeconomic attributes. The results show that farmers' choices of a set of ISFM components are determined by a mix of factors that address the trade-offs and synergies among them. Non-farm income, moderate land quality perception, and education influence simultaneous technology adoption, while gender and crop loss increase the likelihood of farmers' decisions to adopt independent options. Having other sources of income supports co-adoption of inorganic fertilizer, residue incorporation, and crop rotation. Input/output market access, access to information, financial sources, and climate variability also play pivotal role in technology adoption. These results indicate that resource availability, learning costs, finances, and risk aversion need to be considered when designing and promoting ISFM technologies as a package.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 184
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [31] Gwaze FR, 2011, AFR J AGR RES, V6, P4840
  • [32] Holden S.T, 2015, 32015 CLTS NORW U LI
  • [33] International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), 2016, 2016 YOUTH AGR LEAD
  • [34] Jahnke H. E., 1982, Livestock production systems and livestock development in tropical Africa.
  • [35] Agriculture in Africa: Strategies to improve and sustain smallholder production systems
    Jama, Bashir
    Pizarro, Gonzalo
    [J]. REDUCING THE IMPACT OF POVERTY ON HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES, 2008, 1136 : 218 - 232
  • [36] Smallholder income and land distribution in Africa: implications for poverty reduction strategies
    Jayne, TS
    Yamano, T
    Weber, MT
    Tschirley, D
    Rui, BF
    Chapoto, A
    Zulu, B
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2003, 28 (03) : 253 - 275
  • [37] Jha D., 1993, 94 INT FOOD POL RES
  • [38] Understanding the adoption of a portfolio of sustainable intensification practices in eastern and southern Africa
    Kassie, Menale
    Teklewold, Hailemariam
    Jaleta, Moti
    Marenya, Paswel
    Erenstein, Olaf
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 42 : 400 - 411
  • [39] Kebede B, 2006, 05 U OXF CTR STUD AF
  • [40] Field-scale experiments reveal persistent yield gaps in low-input and organic cropping systems
    Kravchenko, Alexandra N.
    Snapp, Sieglinde S.
    Robertson, G. Philip
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (05) : 926 - 931