MRI quality control:: six imagers studied using eleven unified image quality parameters

被引:31
作者
Ihalainen, T
Sipilä, O
Savolainen, S
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys Sci, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Diagnost Lab, Helsinki 00029, Finland
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; phantoms; imaging; quality control;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2278-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Quality control of the magnetic resonance imagers of different vendors in the clinical environment is non-harmonised, and comparing the performance is difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a harmonised longterm quality control protocol for the six imagers in our organisation in order to assure that they fulfil the same basic image quality requirements. The same Eurospin phantom set and identical imaging parameters were used with each imager. Values of 11 comparable parameters describing the image quality were measured. Automatic image analysis software was developed to objectively analyse the images. The results proved that the imagers were operating at a performance level adequate for clinical imaging. Some deficiencies were detected in image uniformity and geometry. The automated analysis of the Eurospin phantom images was successful. The measurements were successfully repeated after 2 weeks on one imager and after half a year on all imagers. As an objective way of examining the image quality, this kind of comparable and objective quality control of different imagers is considered as an essential step towards harmonisation of the clinical MRI studies through a large hospital organisation.
引用
收藏
页码:1859 / 1865
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] *AM COLL RAD, 2001, MAGN RES IM QUAL CON
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, PHANT TEST GUID ACR
  • [3] Automatic quality assessment protocol for MRI equipment
    Bourel, P
    Gibon, D
    Coste, E
    Daanen, V
    Rousseau, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (12) : 2693 - 2700
  • [4] Safety aspects and quality assessment in MRI and MRS: A challenge for health care systems in Europe
    de Certaines, JD
    Cathelineau, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (04) : 632 - 638
  • [5] *DIAGN SON LTD, 1992, EUR 2 MAGN RES QUAL
  • [6] Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience
    Firbank, MJ
    Harrison, RM
    Williams, ED
    Coulthard, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (868) : 376 - 383
  • [7] DETECTION OF DEGRADATION OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE (MR) IMAGES - COMPARISON OF AN AUTOMATED MR IMAGE-QUALITY ANALYSIS SYSTEM WITH TRAINED HUMAN OBSERVERS
    GARDNER, EA
    ELLIS, JH
    HYDE, RJ
    AISEN, AM
    QUINT, DJ
    CARSON, PL
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (04) : 277 - 281
  • [8] Haacke EM, 1999, MAGNETIC RESONANCE I
  • [9] Hough PV., 1962, US Patent, Patent No. 3069654
  • [10] MEASURING SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIOS IN MR IMAGING
    KAUFMAN, L
    KRAMER, DM
    CROOKS, LE
    ORTENDAHL, DA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (01) : 265 - 267