Automated Disassembly Sequence Prediction for Industry 4.0 Using Enhanced Genetic Algorithm

被引:19
作者
Gulivindala, Anil Kumar [1 ]
Bahubalendruni, M. V. A. Raju [1 ]
Chandrasekar, R. [1 ,2 ]
Ahmed, Ejaz [2 ]
Abidi, Mustufa Haider [3 ]
Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Ind Robot & Mfg Automat Lab, Kariakal 609609, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci Engn, Kariakal 609609, India
[3] King Saud Univ, Adv Mfg Inst, Raytheon Chair Syst Engn, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Ind Engn Dept, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
来源
CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA | 2021年 / 69卷 / 02期
关键词
Automation; internet of things; disassembly sequence planning; priori cross over operator; enhanced GA; disassembly predicates; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.32604/cmc.2021.018014
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The evolution of Industry 4.0 made it essential to adopt the Internet of Things (IoT) and Cloud Computing (CC) technologies to perform activities in the new age of manufacturing. These technologies enable collecting, storing, and retrieving essential information from the manufacturing stage. Data collected at sites are shared with others where execution automatedly occurs. The obtained information must be validated at manufacturing to avoid undesirable data losses during the de-manufacturing process. However, information sharing from the assembly level at the manufacturing stage to disassembly at the product end-of-life state is a major concern. The current research validates the information optimally to offer a minimum set of activities to complete the disassembly process. An optimal disassembly sequence plan (DSP) can possess valid information to organize the necessary actions in manufacturing. However, finding an optimal DSP is complex because of its combinatorial nature. The genetic algorithm (GA) is a widely preferred artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to obtain a near-optimal solution for the DSP problem. The converging nature at local optima is a limitation in the traditional GA. This study improvised the GA workability by integrating with the proposed priori crossover operator. An optimality function is defined to reduce disassembly effort by considering directional changes as parameters. The enhanced GA method is tested on a real-time product to evaluate the performance. The obtained results reveal that diversity control depends on the operators employed in the disassembly attributes. The proposed method's solution can be stored in the cloud and shared through IoT devices for effective resource allocation and disassembly for maximum recovery of the product. The effectiveness of the proposed enhanced GA method is determined by making a comparative assessment with traditional GA and other AI methods at different population sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:2531 / 2548
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   A structure-oriented approach to assembly sequence planning [J].
Chakrabarty, S ;
Wolter, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1997, 13 (01) :14-29
[12]   BSFS: Design and Development of Exponential Brain Storm Fuzzy System for Data Classification [J].
Chandrasekar, R. ;
Khare, Neelu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 25 (02) :267-284
[13]   Multiclass Model for Agriculture Development Using Multivariate Statistical Method [J].
Deepa, N. ;
Khan, Mohammad Zubair ;
Prabadevi, B. ;
Vincent, Durai Raj P. M. ;
Maddikunta, Praveen Kumar Reddy ;
Gadekallu, Thippa Reddy .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :183749-183758
[14]   An AI-based intelligent system for healthcare analysis using Ridge-Adaline Stochastic Gradient Descent Classifier [J].
Deepa, N. ;
Prabadevi, B. ;
Maddikunta, Praveen Kumar ;
Gadekallu, Thippa Reddy ;
Baker, Thar ;
Khan, M. Ajmal ;
Tariq, Usman .
JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2021, 77 (02) :1998-2017
[15]   A heuristic method with a novel stability concept to perform parallel assembly sequence planning by subassembly detection [J].
Gulivindala, Anil Kumar ;
Bahubalendruni, M. V. A. Raju ;
Varupala, S. S. Vara Prasad ;
Sankaranarayanasamy, K. .
ASSEMBLY AUTOMATION, 2020, 40 (05) :779-787
[16]   An Optimal Robotic Assembly Sequence Planning by Assembly Subsets Detection Method Using Teaching Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm [J].
Gunji, A. Balamurali ;
Deepak, B. B. B. V. L. ;
Bahubalendruni, C. M. V. A. Raju ;
Biswal, D. Bibhuti Bhushan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (03) :1369-1385
[17]   A hybrid genetic algorithm for sequence-dependent disassembly line balancing problem [J].
Kalayci, Can B. ;
Polat, Olcay ;
Gupta, Surendra M. .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 242 (02) :321-354
[18]   Disassembly sequence planning based on a genetic algorithm [J].
Kheder, Maroua ;
Trigui, Moez ;
Aifaoui, Nizar .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2015, 229 (12) :2281-2290
[19]   A genetic algorithm for disassembly process planning [J].
Kongar, E ;
Gupta, SM .
ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS MANUFACTURING II, 2002, 4569 :54-62
[20]  
Kora P., 2017, ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, V162, DOI [10.5120/ijca2017913370, DOI 10.5120/IJCA2017913370]