Number of books at home as an indicator of socioeconomic status: Examining its extensions and their incremental validity for academic achievement

被引:54
作者
Heppt, Birgit [1 ]
Olczyk, Melanie [2 ]
Volodina, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Sociol, Paracelsusstr 22, D-06114 Halle, Saale, Germany
[3] Univ Bamberg, Markuspl 3, D-96047 Bamberg, Germany
关键词
Books-at-home measure; Validity; Socioeconomic status; Cultural capital; eBooks; Academic language; LITERACY ENVIRONMENTS; READING PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION; LANGUAGE; PARENTS; PERSPECTIVE; VOCABULARY; EXPOSURE; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11218-022-09704-8
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study investigates the incremental validity of the traditional books-at-home measure and selected extensions (i.e., number of children's books and number of ebooks) for explaining students' academic achievement as measured by their academic language comprehension. Using multiple linear regressions, we additionally explore the role of the source of information (i.e., whether information is given by parents or children). Based on cross-sectional data of a German sample of 2353 elementary school children from Grades 2 through 4, we found that parents' information on the number of books and children's books contributed to students' academic language comprehension over and above parental occupation and education. Children's information on the number of books did not further increase the amount of explained variance, and the effects were smaller than those for parents' information. Yet, when investigated separately, both parents' and children's information on the number of books and children's books at home predicted students' academic language comprehension and mediated the relationship between more distal structural features of socioeconomic status (i.e., parents' occupational status and education) and the outcome variable. No effect emerged for the number of ebooks. Our findings point to the robustness of the traditional books-at-home measure when used in parent questionnaires.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 928
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Achugar M., 2005, Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, V16, P298, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.LINGED.2006.02.003, 10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PISA 2009 TECHNICAL, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264167872-EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PISA 2018 RESULTS VO, VII, DOI [DOI 10.1787/B5FD1B8F-EN, 10.1787/9789264251724-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264251724-EN]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, KINDER MEDIEN STUDIE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PISA 2006 Technical Report
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, International Standard Classification of Occupations: Isco-08. Volume 1: Structure, V1
[7]  
Bailey A.L., 2007, Language demands of school: Putting academic language to the test, DOI DOI 10.1177/0265532211404199
[8]   Ramifications of socioeconomic differences for three year old children and their families in Turkey [J].
Baydar, Nazli ;
Akcinar, Berna .
EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2015, 33 :33-48
[9]   Reading Demands in Secondary School: Does the Linguistic Complexity of Textbooks Increase With Grade Level and the Academic Orientation of the School Track? [J].
Berendes, Karin ;
Vajjala, Sowmya ;
Meurers, Detmar ;
Bryant, Doreen ;
Wagner, Wolfgang ;
Chinkina, Maria ;
Trautwein, Ulrich .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 110 (04) :518-543
[10]  
Bourdieu P., 1986, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, P241, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15