Experimental Validation of CFD Simulations of a Lab-Scale Fluidized-Bed Reactor with and Without Side-Gas Injection

被引:61
作者
Min, Jian [1 ]
Drake, Joshua B. [2 ]
Heindel, Theodore J. [2 ]
Fox, Rodney O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50010 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
biofuel processing; fluidized-bed reactor; gas holdup; multiphase flow; tomography; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; FLOW; PARTICLES; DYNAMICS; BIOMASS; BUBBLE; PART;
D O I
10.1002/aic.12077
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Fluidized-bed reactors are widely used in the biofuel industry for combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification processes. In this work, a lab-scale fluidized-bed reactor without and with side-gas injection and filled with 500-600 mu m glass beads is simulated using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code Fluent 6.3, and the results are compared to experimental data obtained using pressure measurements and 3D X-ray computed tomography. An initial grid-dependence CFD study is carried out using 2D simulations, and it is shown that a 4-mm grid resolution is sufficient to capture the time- and spatial-averaged local gas holdup in the lab-scale reactor. Full 3D simulations are then compared with the experimental data on 2D vertical slices through the fluidized bed. Both the experiments and CFD simulations without side-gas injection show that in the cross section of the fluidized bed there are two large off-center symmetric regions in which the gas holdup is larger than in the center of the fluidized bed. The 3D simulations using the Syamlal-O'Brien and Gidaspow drag models predict well the local gas holdup variation throughout the entire fluidized bed when compared to the experimental data. In comparison, simulations with the Wen-Yu drag model generally over predict the local gas holdup. The agreement between experiments and simulations with side-gas injection is generally good, where the side-gas injection simulates the immediate volatilization of biomass. However, the effect of the side-gas injection extends further into the fluidized bed in the experiments as compared to the simulations. Overall the simulations under predict the gas dispersion rate above the side-gas injector. (C) 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChEJ, 56: 1434-1446, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / 1446
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, US
[2]  
Cammarata L, 2003, INT J CHEM REACT ENG, V1
[3]   CFD modelling of a liquid-solid fluidized bed [J].
Cornelissen, Jack T. ;
Taghipour, Fariborz ;
Escudie, Renaud ;
Ellis, Naoko ;
Grace, John R. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (22) :6334-6348
[4]   Fluidization of biomass particles: A review of experimental multiphase flow aspects [J].
Cui, Heping ;
Grace, John R. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (1-2) :45-55
[5]  
DARTON RC, 1977, T I CHEM ENG-LOND, V55, P274
[6]  
Enwald H, 1996, INT J MULTIPHAS FLOW, V22, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0301-9322(96)90004-X
[7]  
FRANKA NP, 2007, P IMECE2007 2007 ASM
[8]  
Gidaspow D., 1994, Multiphase Flow and Fluidization, P1
[9]  
Grace J.R., 2006, Multiphase Flow Handbook, p5
[10]   DEM-LES study of 3-D bubbling fluidized bed with immersed tubes [J].
Gui, Nan ;
Fan, Jian Ren ;
Luo, Kun .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2008, 63 (14) :3654-3663