Comparison of tests for fecal lactoferrin and fecal occult blood for colorectal diseases: A prospective pilot study

被引:17
作者
Saitoh, O [1 ]
Kojima, K [1 ]
Kayazawa, M [1 ]
Sugi, K [1 ]
Tanaka, S [1 ]
Nakagawa, K [1 ]
Teranishi, T [1 ]
Matsuse, R [1 ]
Uchida, K [1 ]
Morikawa, H [1 ]
Hirata, I [1 ]
Katsu, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Coll, Dept Internal Med 2, Osaka 5698686, Japan
关键词
feces; hemoglobin; colorectal-neoplasms; inflammatory bowel disease; internal hemorrhoids;
D O I
10.2169/internalmedicine.39.778
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective This prospective pilot study was conducted to compare the usefulness of measuring fecal lactoferrin (Lf) to that of fecal occult blood (FOB) test for detection of colorectal diseases. Patients and Methods The subjects were 351 patients who underwent colonoscopy. A fecal sample was obtained on the day before colonoscopy. Fecal Lf was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The FOE test was performed by combined assay (latex agglutination) of hemoglobin and transferrin. Results The specificities of the fecal Lf and FOE tests were the same (88.7%). For patients with colorectal cancer (13), colorectal polyp (69), ulcerative colitis (18), Crohn's disease (13), non-specific colitis (8), internal hemorrhoids (60), colon diverticulum (27), and miscellaneous diseases of the colon (10), the rates of positivity for fecal Lf were 7/ 13, 14/69, 12/18, 7/13, 4/8, 22/60, 8/27, and 6/10, respectively. The corresponding rates for FOE were 8/13, 12/69, 11/18, 4/13, 4/8, 9/60, 2/27, and 1/10. For patients with internal hemorrhoids, the rate of positivity for fecal Lf was significantly higher than that for FOE. In other disease groups, there was no significant difference in the rate of positivity between fecal Lf and FOE. Conclusion These findings suggest that measurement of fecal Lf is as useful as FOE in detecting colorectal diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 782
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening [J].
Allison, JE ;
Tekawa, IS ;
Ransom, LJ ;
Adrain, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (03) :155-159
[2]  
BEST WR, 1976, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V70, P439
[3]  
Bond John H., 1999, American Journal of Medicine, V106, p7S, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00339-8
[4]  
FLEET JC, 1995, NUTR REV, V53, P226, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1995.tb01556.x
[5]  
KANEKO M, 1990, IGAKU TO YAKUGAKU, V23, P591
[6]  
LONNERDAL B, 1995, ANNU REV NUTR, V15, P93, DOI 10.1146/annurev.nu.15.070195.000521
[7]   EVALUATION OF RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE DATA IN TERMS OF INFORMATION-THEORY, WITH APPLICATIONS IN RADIOGRAPHY [J].
METZ, CE ;
GOODENOUGH, DJ ;
ROSSMANN, K .
RADIOLOGY, 1973, 109 (02) :297-303
[8]  
MIYOSHI H, 1992, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V87, P67
[9]  
Ransohoff DF, 1997, ANN INTERN MED, V126, P811, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-126-10-199705150-00014
[10]   REDUCTION IN RISK OF MORTALITY FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER BY FECAL OCCULT BLOOD SCREENING WITH IMMUNOCHEMICAL HEMAGGLUTINATION TEST - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY [J].
SAITO, H ;
SOMA, Y ;
KOEDA, J ;
WADA, T ;
KAWAGUCHI, H ;
SOBUE, T ;
AISAWA, T ;
YOSHIDA, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 61 (04) :465-469