Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in domestic animals: A short review

被引:4
作者
Carvalho, Gabriela Muniz [1 ]
Ramos, Carolina Pantuzza [1 ]
Lobato, Francisco Carlos Faria [1 ]
Guedes, Roberto Mauricio Carvalho [1 ]
Giaretta, Paula Roberta [1 ]
Silva, Rodrigo Otavio Silveira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Vet Sch, Ave Antonio Carlos 6627, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Diarrhea; CDI; Colitis; Pseudomembranous; A; B toxins; DIFFICILE-ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA; PERFRINGENS TYPE-A; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; CATS DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN-A; DOGS; HORSES; PIGLETS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102574
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Despite the known importance of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in animals, there are no published guidelines for the diagnosis of CDI. The performance of the available commercial methods, all standardized for human stool samples, can vary according to the animal species. Thus, the aim of the present study was to review the literature on the detection of C. difficile in pigs, horses, and dogs. The detection of toxins A and B using enzyme immunoassays seems to have low performance in piglet and dog samples, while it shows high sensitivity for the diagnosis of CDI in foals. On the other hand, tests for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) have a high sensitivity towards detection of C. difficile in animal samples, suggesting that it can be an adequate screening method. A few studies have evaluated real-time PCR or nucleic acid amplification tests in animal samples and, so far, these methods have also shown a low performance for the detection of C. difficile in animals. Although the intestinal lesions caused by CDI can vary among animal species, histopathology can be a useful auxiliary tool for post -mortem diagnosis in animals. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals
    Weese, J. Scott
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2020, 32 (02) : 213 - 221
  • [2] Optimizing the Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection
    Gilligan, Peter H.
    CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 35 (02) : 299 - +
  • [3] Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
    Le Guern, Remi
    Wallet, Frederic
    ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2013, 71 (04) : 395 - 400
  • [4] Clostridium difficile infection diagnosis
    Eckert, C.
    Lalande, V.
    Barbut, F.
    JOURNAL DES ANTI-INFECTIEUX, 2011, 13 (02) : 67 - 73
  • [5] Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
    Martinez-Melendez, Adrian
    Camacho-Ortiz, Adrian
    Morfin-Otero, Rayo
    Maldonado-Garza, Hector Jesus
    Viiiarreai-Trevino, Licet
    Garza-Gonzaiez, Eivira
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (09) : 1552 - 1567
  • [6] Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile
    Carroll, Karen C.
    Mizusawa, Masako
    CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2020, 33 (02) : 73 - 81
  • [7] Effective Utilization of Evolving Methods for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection
    Kufelnicka, Anna M.
    Kirn, Thomas J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 52 (12) : 1451 - 1457
  • [8] Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection and impact of testing
    Viprey, Virginie F.
    Clark, Emma
    Davies, Kerrie A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 73 (12)
  • [9] Clostridium difficile Infection in Production Animals and Avian Species: A Review
    Moono, Peter
    Foster, Niki F.
    Hampson, David J.
    Knight, Daniel R.
    Bloomfield, Lauren E.
    Riley, Thomas V.
    FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2016, 13 (12) : 647 - 655
  • [10] Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection in Spain: a population-based survey
    Alcala, L.
    Marin, M.
    Martin, A.
    Sanchez-Somolinos, M.
    Catalan, P.
    Pelaez, M. T.
    Bouza, E.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2011, 79 (01) : 13 - 17