Global priorities for conservation across multiple dimensions of mammalian diversity

被引:210
作者
Brum, Fernanda T. [1 ,2 ]
Graham, Catherine H. [3 ,4 ]
Costa, Gabriel C. [5 ]
Hedges, S. Blair [6 ]
Penone, Caterina [7 ]
Radeloff, Volker C. [8 ]
Rondinini, Carlo [9 ]
Loyola, Rafael [1 ]
Davidson, Ana D. [3 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Dept Ecol, Conservat Biogeog Lab, BR-74680900 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Programa Pos Grad Ecol, BR-15007 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[5] Auburn Univ, Dept Biol, Montgomery, AL 36124 USA
[6] Temple Univ, Ctr Biodivers, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[7] Univ Bern, Inst Plant Sci, CH-3013 Bern, Switzerland
[8] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, SILVIS Lab, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[9] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Biol & Biotechnol, Global Mammal Assessment Program, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[10] NatureServe, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
[11] Colorado State Univ, Colorado Nat Heritage Program, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
complementarity; phylogenetic dimension; spatial conservation prioritization; taxonomic dimension; trait dimension; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; PROTECTED AREAS; LAND-USE; CARNIVORE CONSERVATION; EXTINCTION RISK; BIODIVERSITY; PATTERNS; EXPANSION; IMPUTATION; MISMATCH;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1706461114
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Conservation priorities that are based on species distribution, endemism, and vulnerability may underrepresent biologically unique species as well as their functional roles and evolutionary histories. To ensure that priorities are biologically comprehensive, multiple dimensions of diversity must be considered. Further, understanding how the different dimensions relate to one another spatially is important for conservation prioritization, but the relationship remains poorly understood. Here, we use spatial conservation planning to (i) identify and compare priority regions for global mammal conservation across three key dimensions of biodiversity-taxonomic, phylogenetic, and traits-and (ii) determine the overlap of these regions with the locations of threatened species and existing protected areas. We show that priority areas for mammal conservation exhibit low overlap across the three dimensions, highlighting the need for an integrative approach for biodiversity conservation. Additionally, currently protected areas poorly represent the three dimensions of mammalian biodiversity. We identify areas of high conservation priority among and across the dimensions that should receive special attention for expanding the global protected area network. These high-priority areas, combined with areas of high priority for other taxonomic groups and with social, economic, and political considerations, provide a biological foundation for future conservation planning efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:7641 / 7646
页数:6
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [11] Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world
    Devictor, Vincent
    Mouillot, David
    Meynard, Christine
    Jiguet, Frederic
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    Mouquet, Nicolas
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 13 (08) : 1030 - 1040
  • [12] Reinventing residual reserves in the sea: are we favouring ease of establishment over need for protection?
    Devillers, Rodolphe
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Grech, Alana
    Kittinger, John N.
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Ward, Trevor
    Watson, Reg
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, 25 (04) : 480 - 504
  • [13] A novel approach for global mammal extinction risk reduction
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Cardillo, Marcel
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Blomberg, Simon P.
    Boitani, Luigi
    Rondinini, Carlo
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2012, 5 (02): : 134 - 141
  • [14] Global priorities for national carnivore conservation under land use change
    Di Minin, Enrico
    Slotow, Rob
    Hunter, Luke T. B.
    Pouzols, Federico Montesino
    Toivonen, Tuuli
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Leader-Williams, Nigel
    Petracca, Lisanne
    Moilanen, Atte
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [15] Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments
    Diaz, Sandra
    Lavorel, Sandra
    de Bello, Francesco
    Quetier, Fabien
    Grigulis, Karl
    Robson, Matthew
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (52) : 20684 - 20689
  • [16] Diniz JAF, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1247, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02006.x
  • [17] On the selection of phylogenetic eigenvectors for ecological analyses
    Diniz-Filho, Jose Alexandre F.
    Bini, Luis Mauricio
    Rangel, Thiago Fernando
    Morales-Castilla, Ignacio
    Olalla-Tarraga, Miguel A.
    Rodriguez, Miguel A.
    Hawkins, Bradford A.
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2012, 35 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [18] Globalizing Conservation Efforts to Save Species and Enhance Food Production
    Dobrovolski, Ricardo
    Loyola, Rafael
    da Fonseca, Gustavo A. B.
    Diniz-Filho, Jose A. F.
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (06) : 539 - 545
  • [19] Global agricultural expansion and carnivore conservation biogeography
    Dobrovolski, Ricardo
    Loyola, Rafael D.
    Guilhaumon, Francois
    Gouveia, Sidney F.
    Diniz-Filho, Jose Alexandre F.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 165 : 162 - 170
  • [20] Taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic dimensions of rodent biodiversity along an extensive tropical elevational gradient
    Dreiss, Lindsay M.
    Burgio, Kevin R.
    Cisneros, Laura M.
    Klingbeil, Brian T.
    Patterson, Bruce D.
    Presley, Steven J.
    Willig, Michael R.
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2015, 38 (09) : 876 - 888