A prospective doubleblind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder

被引:28
|
作者
Cho, C-H [1 ]
Min, B-W [1 ]
Bae, K-C [1 ]
Lee, K-J [1 ]
Kim, D. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; STEROID INJECTION; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; SITES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Methods Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection. Results The accuracy of injection in the US and blind groups was 100% (45/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvements in VAS pain score, ASES score, SSV, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation throughout follow-up until 12 weeks after injection (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the VAS pain scores, the ASES score, the SSV and all ROMs between the two groups at the time points assessed (all p > 0.05). No injection-related adverse effects were noted in either group. Conclusion We found no significant differences in pain and functional outcomes between the two groups, although an US-guided injection was associated with greater accuracy. Considering that it is both costly and time-consuming, an US-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid seems not always to be necessary in the treatment of FS as it gives similar outcomes as a blind injection.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided corticosteroid injections for tendinosis of the long head of the biceps: A randomized comparative study
    Yiannakopoulos, Christos K.
    Megaloikonomos, Panayiotis D.
    Foufa, Konstantina
    Gliatis, John
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (04) : 585 - 591
  • [43] Intra-Articular Versus Periarticular Acromioclavicular Joint Injection: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Sabeti-Aschraf, Manuel
    Stotter, Christoph
    Thaler, Christoph
    Kristen, Karlheinz
    Schmidt, Maximilian
    Krifter, Rolf Michael
    Hexel, Michael
    Ostermann, Roman
    Hofstaedter, Thomas
    Graf, Alexandra
    Windhager, Reinhard
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (12): : 1903 - 1910
  • [44] Hymovis® Intra-Articular Injections vs Corticosteroids Intra-Articular Injections in Patients Affected by Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Monocentric Randomized Open-Label Trial
    Di Giacomo, Giovanni
    de Gasperis, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2023, 37 (12): : 6525 - 6534
  • [45] Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus blind glenohumeral injections: a cadaveric study
    Patel, Deepan N.
    Nayyar, Samir
    Hasan, Saqib
    Khatib, Omar
    Sidash, Stanislav
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (12) : 1664 - 1668
  • [46] Intra-articular Steroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis
    Sun, Yaying
    Zhang, Peng
    Liu, Shaohua
    Li, Hong
    Jiang, Jia
    Chen, Shiyi
    Chen, Jiwu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (09): : 2171 - 2179
  • [47] Ultrasound-guided Shoulder Intraarticular Ozone Injection Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency Application for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Foula, Ahmed S.
    Sabry, Laila S.
    Elmulla, Ahmed F.
    Kamel, Maher A.
    Hozien, Adel Ibrahim
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2023, 26 (03) : E329 - E340
  • [48] Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder- A Randomised Control Trial
    Swaroop, S.
    Gupta, P.
    Patnaik, S.
    Reddy, S. S.
    MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [49] Ultrasound versus palpation guidance for intra-articular injections in patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the elbow
    Kim, Tai Kon
    Lee, Ji Hae
    Park, Ki Deok
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Ahn, Jaeki
    Park, Yongbum
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2013, 41 (08) : 479 - 485
  • [50] Exercise therapy after ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
    Ellegaard, Karen
    Christensen, Robin
    Rosager, Sara
    Bartholdy, Cecilie
    Torp-Pedersen, Soren
    Bandholm, Thomas
    Danneskiold-Samsoe, Bente
    Bliddal, Henning
    Henriksen, Marius
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2016, 18