A prospective doubleblind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder

被引:28
|
作者
Cho, C-H [1 ]
Min, B-W [1 ]
Bae, K-C [1 ]
Lee, K-J [1 ]
Kim, D. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; STEROID INJECTION; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; SITES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Methods Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection. Results The accuracy of injection in the US and blind groups was 100% (45/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvements in VAS pain score, ASES score, SSV, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation throughout follow-up until 12 weeks after injection (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the VAS pain scores, the ASES score, the SSV and all ROMs between the two groups at the time points assessed (all p > 0.05). No injection-related adverse effects were noted in either group. Conclusion We found no significant differences in pain and functional outcomes between the two groups, although an US-guided injection was associated with greater accuracy. Considering that it is both costly and time-consuming, an US-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid seems not always to be necessary in the treatment of FS as it gives similar outcomes as a blind injection.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultrasound guided intra-articular ketorolac versus corticosteroid injection in osteoarthritis of the hip: a retrospective comparative study
    Park, Ki Deok
    Kim, Tai Kon
    Bae, Byung Woo
    Ahn, JaeKi
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yongbum
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (09) : 1333 - 1340
  • [32] Evaluation of treatment with intra-articular injections in osteoarticular pathology of the shoulder in primary care
    Araceli Soler-Perez, Maria
    del Carmen Serrano-Corcoles, Maria
    Ferrer-Marquez, Manuel
    del Mar Lopez-Gonzalez, Maria
    Angel Perez-Saez, Miguel
    Manuel Garcia-Torrecillas, Juan
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2021, 53 (07):
  • [33] Effects of Ultrasound-guided intra-articular ketorolac injection with capsular distension
    Ahn, Jae Ki
    Kim, Jongwoo
    Lee, Sang Jae
    Park, Yongbum
    Bae, Byung Woo
    Lee, Woo Yong
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 28 (03) : 497 - 503
  • [34] Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Injections by Long Axis in Plane Approach on Three Different Sites of the Knee
    Park, Ki Deok
    Ahn, Jae Ki
    Lee, Sang-Chul
    Lee, Jihae
    Kim, Jongwoo
    Park, Yongbum
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2013, 92 (11) : 990 - 998
  • [35] Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial
    Roh, Young Hak
    Yi, Seung Rim
    Noh, Jung Ho
    Lee, Sung Yup
    Oh, Joo Han
    Gong, Hyun Sik
    Baek, Goo Hyun
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2012, 20 (10) : 1943 - 1948
  • [36] Functional improvement of bilateral frozen shoulder by unilateral intra-articular corticosteroid injection: a retrospective study
    Kim, Minchul
    Kim, Ki-Yong
    Huh, Yool-Gang
    Ma, Sang Hyeok
    Jeong, Kil-Yong
    Yoon, Seung-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (10)
  • [37] A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular triamcinolone and/or physiotherapy in shoulder capsulitis
    Ryans, I
    Montgomery, A
    Galway, R
    Kernohan, WG
    McKane, R
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 44 (04) : 529 - 535
  • [38] Clinical efficacy of hydrodistention with joint manipulation under interscalene block compared with intra-articular corticosteroid injection for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Mun, Sang Won
    Baek, Chang Hee
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (12) : 1937 - 1943
  • [39] Single Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder A Cohort Study
    Barman, Apurba
    Mukherjee, Somnath
    Sahoo, Jagannatha
    Maiti, Rituparna
    Rao, Parnandi Bhaskar
    Sinha, Mithilesh Kumar
    Sahoo, Dibyajyoti
    Tripathy, Sujit Kumar
    Patro, Binod Kumar
    Bag, Nerbadyswari Deep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2019, 98 (07) : 549 - 557
  • [40] Comparison of intra-articular injections of Hyaluronic Acid and Corticosteroid in the treatment of Osteoarthritis of the hip in comparison with intra-articular injections of Bupivacaine. Design of a prospective, randomized, controlled study with blinding of the patients and outcome assessors
    Colen, Sascha
    van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
    Bellemans, Johan
    Mulier, Michiel
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11