A prospective doubleblind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder

被引:28
|
作者
Cho, C-H [1 ]
Min, B-W [1 ]
Bae, K-C [1 ]
Lee, K-J [1 ]
Kim, D. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; STEROID INJECTION; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; SITES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Methods Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection. Results The accuracy of injection in the US and blind groups was 100% (45/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvements in VAS pain score, ASES score, SSV, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation throughout follow-up until 12 weeks after injection (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the VAS pain scores, the ASES score, the SSV and all ROMs between the two groups at the time points assessed (all p > 0.05). No injection-related adverse effects were noted in either group. Conclusion We found no significant differences in pain and functional outcomes between the two groups, although an US-guided injection was associated with greater accuracy. Considering that it is both costly and time-consuming, an US-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid seems not always to be necessary in the treatment of FS as it gives similar outcomes as a blind injection.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Blind or Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injections and Short-Term Response in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study
    Dogu, Beril
    Yucel, Serap Dalgic
    Sag, Sinem Yamac
    Bankaoglu, Mujdat
    Kuran, Banu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2012, 91 (08) : 658 - 665
  • [22] Economic Impact of Ketorolac vs Corticosteroid Intra-Articular Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study
    Bellamy, Jaime L.
    Goff, Brandon J.
    Sayeed, Siraj A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (09): : S293 - S297
  • [23] Ultrasound Guided Suprascapular Nerve Block versus Intra-articular Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Periarthritis Shoulder: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Jain, Sakshi
    Borah, Diganta
    Meena, Dharam Singh
    Ali, Junis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (09) : KC01 - KC5
  • [24] Manipulation or intra-articular steroids in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder? A prospective randomized trial
    Jacobs, Leo G.
    Smith, Matthew Guy
    Khan, Sohail A.
    Smith, Karen
    Joshi, Miland
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (03) : 348 - 353
  • [25] Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Injection of the Hip: The Nashville Sound
    Bardowski, Elizabeth A.
    Byrd, J. W. Thomas
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (04): : E383 - E388
  • [26] Efficacy of Intra-Articular Steroid Injection in the Management of Primary Frozen Shoulder
    Siddique, Mudassar
    Akhtar, M. Saeed
    Niazi, Noman Shakeel
    Malik, Adnan Latif
    Ali, Hassan
    Niazi, Suhail Niaz Khan
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (03): : 717 - 719
  • [27] Comparison of efficacy of Oral versus Intra-articular Corticosteroid Application in the treatment of Frozen Shoulder: An experimental study in rats
    Cinar, Bekir Murat
    Battal, Vahit Erdal
    Bal, Nebil
    Guler, Umit Ozgur
    Beyaz, Salih
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2022, 56 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [28] Ultrasound-Guided Standard vs Dual-Target Subacromial Corticosteroid Injections for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wang, Jia-Chi
    Chang, Ke-Vin
    Wu, Wei-Ting
    Han, Der-Sheng
    Ozcakar, Levent
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 100 (11): : 2119 - 2128
  • [29] Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Dextrose Versus Corticosteroid in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis Management: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Raissi, Gholamreza
    Arbabi, Amin
    Rafiei, Maryam
    Forogh, Bijan
    Babaei-Ghazani, Arash
    Soltani, Shayesteh Khalifeh
    Ahadi, Tannaz
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2023, 16 (01) : 9 - 19
  • [30] Comparison of Intra-Articular Injection and Arthroscopic Capsular Release in Stages I and II of Primary Frozen Shoulder, a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Zhu, Qi
    Jiang, Yao
    Wang, Haiming
    He, Yaohua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2019, 13 (01) : 81 - 86