"Traffic intervention" policy fails to mitigate air pollution in megacity Delhi

被引:78
作者
Chowdhury, Sourangsu [1 ]
Dey, Sagnik [1 ]
Tripathi, Sachchida Nand [2 ,3 ]
Beig, Gufran [4 ]
Mishra, Amit Kumar [5 ]
Sharma, Sumit [6 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Atmospher Sci, Delhi, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Environm Sci & Engn, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
[4] Indian Inst Trop Meteorol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[5] CSIR Natl Phys Lab, Environm & Biomed Metrol Div, New Delhi, India
[6] Energy Resources Inst, Delhi, India
关键词
PM2.5; RESTRICTION; OZONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Megacity Delhi has been ranked amongst the top most polluted cities in the world consistently over the last few years (WHO, 2016). As a desperate and emergency measure, the administration implemented 'traffic intervention' mitigation effort by instigating 'odd-even' policy as a trial for 15 days in January (1-15) 2016. During this period, odd and even numbered private cars were restricted to respective odd and even days. Here we examine the impact of this policy intervention on ambient particulate matter smaller than 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) through a combination of in-situ, satellite and model data. Traffic restriction reduces PM2.5 by 4-6% (maximum up to 10% in three local hotspots) which is within the uncertainty range of satellite-based estimates (and hence not detected). This is not a significant result considering the fact that such step was taken as an emergency measure when PM(2.5)exposure exceeded 250 mu g/m(3) during the winter season. The failure is attributed to stable meteorological conditions (winds are not strong enough to disperse PM2.5 away) during the period and there was no control over PM2.5 outside the periphery of the city. A more comprehensive inter-sectoral and inter -state action plan is required to address this alarming issue in this region.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, PUBL HLTH AIR POLL A
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, COMPREHENSIVE STUDY
  • [3] Central Pollution Control Board Delhi Central Pollution Control Board D., 2016, ASS IMP ODD EV SCHEM
  • [4] Chelani A. B., 2013, STAT CHARACTERISTICS, P1768, DOI [10.4209/aaqr.2012.09.0243, DOI 10.4209/AAQR.2012.09.0243]
  • [5] Chelani A. B., 2005, IMPACT CHANGE FUEL Q, P600
  • [6] Application of LIDAR technique and MM5-CMAQ modeling approach for the assessment of winter PM10 air pollution:: A case study in Beijing, China
    Chen, D. S.
    Cheng, S. Y.
    Li, J. B.
    Chen, T.
    Zhao, X. Y.
    Guo, X. R.
    Hu, H. L.
    Yu, T.
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2007, 181 (1-4) : 409 - 427
  • [7] Ching J., EPA600R99030
  • [8] Cause-specific premature death from ambient PM2.5 exposure in India: Estimate adjusted for baseline mortality
    Chowdhury, Sourangsu
    Dey, Sagnik
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 91 : 283 - 290
  • [9] Variability of outdoor fine particulate (PM2.5) concentration in the Indian Subcontinent: A remote sensing approach
    Dey, Sagnik
    Di Girolamo, Larry
    van Donkelaar, Aaron
    Tripathi, S. N.
    Gupta, Tarun
    Mohan, Manju
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 127 : 153 - 161
  • [10] Goel R., 2016, VEHICULAR POLLUTION, P41